C100Scottie
Active member
this camera looks intriguing, but that red has got to go. It's not as cool as they think it is. the new JVC looks much more impressive.
AG-DVX200 4K Large-Sensor Handheld Camcorder
- Thread starter Screenforme
- Start date
Darren Levine
Veteran
i don't mind the red, and i think it's very intentional, it's no secret that cameras are buzzwords, and what better way to make a camera recognizable then spilling a red can of paint over half of it
philiplipetz
Veteran
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::dankk2:does that rear door open up? kinda looks like it could flip around to be a shoulder brace
Severe camera lust has become uncontrollable. I want! I want! Cannot think, must have this red beauty.
I was thinking the same thing, Darren. So many handheld cameras look just alike at first glance. The red on this will make it instantly recognizable as a DVX. Actually a very smart move. And the look is growing on me.
The original DVX was QUITE distinctive.
originalauthor
Member
I to hope the Red Door goes. Its does not do anything visually. It makes it look cheap to me. Maybe its the plastics that is used.
I don't think it looks that bad. The only problem I have with it is that it might evoke an XL-1s.
ATL Media Group
Veteran
I don't think it looks that bad. The only problem I have with it is that it might evoke an XL-1s.
I don't mind it either... I almost lost my lunch though with the XL1S comment.. haha... eww..
Seriously.. the camera actually looks good IMHO... a little cheesy with the carbon but the red looks nice.
Thomas Smet
Veteran
I actually like the look of the DVX200. Almost makes it seem like a RED camera with the industrial metal look it has.
does that rear door open up? kinda looks like it could flip around to be a shoulder brace
I think they hide the battery there for a better shoothing.
The Red ... Rocket Launcher?
DPStewart
Veteran
I don't think it looks that bad. The only problem I have with it is that it might evoke an XL-1s.
Ha! That's not bad for me - The first HUGE gig I got was shooting for Special Olympics for an entire year - on the 2 XZ-1s's they gave me to use.
That's a reference to the early days of DVXuser.
Jaime Valles
Veteran
I really like the way the DVX200 looks, red and all.
I just want to know if it will perform better in low light than a GH4 with a 35-100 f/2.8 lens. If so, I'm very interested.
I just want to know if it will perform better in low light than a GH4 with a 35-100 f/2.8 lens. If so, I'm very interested.
Camera Expert
Well-known member
:54 mark of the video. AVC Ultra at 444. He most likely made a mistake but that would be awesome if it was true. Reps are humans too and mistakes can happen sometimes.
Here I am hoping that it shoots to at the very least 10 bit and 422 and while watching the video I'm hearing AVC Ultra at 444. Thoughts to myself. "WHAT!" It's a good thing I wasn't drinking my juice at that time or I probably would have chocked.
Here I am hoping that it shoots to at the very least 10 bit and 422 and while watching the video I'm hearing AVC Ultra at 444. Thoughts to myself. "WHAT!" It's a good thing I wasn't drinking my juice at that time or I probably would have chocked.
Last edited:
Mike Harvey
Veteran
Haha... no kidding.
ATL Media Group
Veteran
Well, maybe 10 bit 422 and 120fps in HD.. still kinda nice.