Stephen W
Well-known member
What I was getting at is that, depending on who you believe, the "real" resolution you get from a Bayer Array is 70-90% of the actual number of pixels that make up the sensor.
So to get "true" 4K resolution, you'd oversample (say at 4520x2540). But as the sensor is 4900x2580, you still get information around the edge of the recorded frame.
I'm assuming that what the RED team has done is to actually record the full 4900x2580 output from the sensor, but they're telling us that in the Red One we'll have a maximum output of 4520x2540 RAW - which still leaves us a 380x80 margin around the frame, and should still allow us to create a "true" 4k image from the RAW output.
So to get "true" 4K resolution, you'd oversample (say at 4520x2540). But as the sensor is 4900x2580, you still get information around the edge of the recorded frame.
I'm assuming that what the RED team has done is to actually record the full 4900x2580 output from the sensor, but they're telling us that in the Red One we'll have a maximum output of 4520x2540 RAW - which still leaves us a 380x80 margin around the frame, and should still allow us to create a "true" 4k image from the RAW output.