It just ended production.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've already been *****-smacked once by a studio over something posted on an internet site (that, by the way, did not divulge privileged information, or anything like that). Since I don't particularly enjoy wasting time palavering with Labor Relations, why invite that kind of crap, again?
It just ended production.
BTW I took it on myself to change my name to my actual name. I wish everyone would do this.
you can change your name all you want, but in my mind i still think of you as that guy that sort of looks like the lead actor from the television series "hack". i remember some names but a lot of the times i make associations based on the avatar.
I don't really use my actual name very much. Anywhere. If I started, I think it would confuse people.
I don't really use my actual name very much. Anywhere. If I started, I think it would confuse people.
Who?:grin:That's So true Ryan. :happy:
It is not cheap to make a film, and the dwindling turnout for dvxfests is probably partially due to lack of funds.
But it's never been cheaper and the prizes are great!? And as someone who's entered a bunch of them, I rarely spent a dime on them aside from food and the odd prop.I think the poor state of the film economy has seriously cut into people's film-making endeavors. It is not cheap to make a film, and the dwindling turnout for dvxfests is probably partially due to lack of funds.
This might be an issue. It would be cool if DVXuser hooked up with an Independent Film Review site for these festivals. They could still keep the current system for some sort of 'Audience Choice' award.Another reason might be that the fests are less a measure of quality work, and more a measure of popularity. Any competition that's judged solely by the number of 'votes' someone can generate is not really a competition at all, in my opinion. Okay, I know the fest winners are based on what is essentially a 1-10 voting scale, but it still amounts to the same thing. A good many folks tend to watch/read -- and vote on -- only entries by people they know, like or respect. Sure, there are some who view every single entry and judge accordingly, but it's still a flawed system. I would be much more likely to enter if the winners were chosen by an impartial panel of qualified judges.
I don't think it would mean streaming only. Just eliminate voters who only vote for a few entries.I see your point David, that is something I have thought of before. In the end with it being free, it will be hard to ever get around the popluarity vote, but I think there should be a way to implement that you cannot vote unless you have watched all the films. This would of course mean streaming only (which I wouldn't like) but in an ideal world......
Rarely does the cream not rise to the top.Charli, I totally understand that. I'm just saying that it's hard to put forth the time, effort and money on something for a fest, knowing that there's no truly fair system of judging involved.
Piggybacking on a side not, I too wish the User Film section was more active, and would gladly give up the DSLR user films and every other subcategory for other cameras (if there are UF sections within those) to bring it back. Uf section used to be a place to get immense amounts of help, and was one of the sections that I checked almost daily to maybe offer advice, mostly see what people were doing, or if I had my own project going, to get feedback on cuts, etc. Now though it seems that I rarely check it as there is a lack of discussion for most films. Sure there are some that get plenty of comments, critiques, etc but most of the posts just fall deeper and deeper into the thread without any attention![]()