Interesting, will have to try that.I found the noise to be identical between a 12,800 pulled down to 1600 vs 1600 straight from the camera, and the AF worked remarkably better at the higher ISO.)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting, will have to try that.I found the noise to be identical between a 12,800 pulled down to 1600 vs 1600 straight from the camera, and the AF worked remarkably better at the higher ISO.)
Yes, me too. Makes no sense at all.
Only on paper with what you think you're gaining and/or losing.
That is the beauty of working with gear you know. You learn how to get the best out of it and make it work for you.Dive back into CML's camera tests and pay attention to what happens when a camera clips. They all pretty much do the same thing (most clip one or more colors sooner than the others, including Arri), and frankly, Canon isn't anywhere close to being the worst even of the big boys. Roll off by definition indicates a certain compression of the highlight tones, and this can be accomplished in encoding, as Arri and some others do, or in post as Canon, and many others do. Don't let the camera clip and then use a wideDR type LUT to compress the highlights, and you have a "soft" clip as a result. Clip the camera and then try to expand (darken) the highlights, and you will have a hard clip as a result. (this has been a hallmark of Cine type gammas since before we started calling these boxes "cinema" cameras.) Where Arri gets it right is with its dual gain read, as it allows for a much better looking shadow, while holding bright highlights, than Canon and most others. The new C300II seems to move Canon in Arri's direction with its cleaner shadows, and frankly the C500 II with its larger sensor, and either post NR, or a low level of spatial and temporal NR in camera, is pretty successful at arriving at the same result. (I need to get back to my in-camera NR test I started awhile ago...there were definitely some interesting results).
I was talking to a friend about doing some camera tests, and he mentioned how much he liked the one you did with the C500ii.
Can you shoot in S35 cropped mode in Raw on the C500 II? I thought the 4K mode on the C500 II was a scaled mode, and therefore uses the full sensor.
Oh wow that's very kind, I'm glad to hear he found it helpful!
Canon's cine primes are full frame and they're only available in PL after a Duclos modification.
I was thinking the same thing. I think some people don't like my humor or what can come across as an uppity attitude at times so have taken a habit of down-voting my posts even if they aren't just joke posts as an uncharitable effort to discourage my posting. It would be cool if like FB, Instagram, etc., post voting wasn't anonymous as then people would be less likely to use it just to anonymously jab at someone. Let's hope they find better things to do than belittle people on the Internet who have never meant them any harm.Dude, you are often willing to make out landish jokes, but I wonder why people down vote your good posts. Baffles me. Like people don't read what you right. Although Canon announced PL versions of their Primes, I haven't seen any one selling them yet. A quick internet search reveals no immediate results of the PL versions. Sumire lenses have PL, but that isn't the CN-E.
Canon's official page for their full frame cine primes:
https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/list/lenses/cinema/prime
Well number two is kind of irrelevant if you're getting Super35 lenses, and secondly I don't believe that's true considering the Fujinon Premista is a PL full frame lens; they've mentioned possibly coming out with an LPL mount but nothing so far. I know LPL has some advantages with telecentricity, but PL still works well on full frame otherwise high end companies wouldn't be making full frame PL lenses. The Angenieux full frame primes also have an optional PL mount, and the full frame Sumires come in PL. Among many other full frame PL mount lenses - Cooke S7, Leitz, etc.Two or three reasons NOT to get PL immediately.
1: no wide spread auto focus solutions
2: the mount is not wide enough for future LPL lenses design for larger format sensors.
Which leads to #3 which means prices on s35 PL lenses may begin to go down in price.
Somehow, I think you captured the imagination of the shooter.
Owlbot, are you working over at Filmtools? I noticed you were in some Filmtools branded videos. And do you have any plans to get your hands on a C300 III?
Canon's cine primes are full frame and they're only available in PL after a Duclos modification.
Well number two is kind of irrelevant if you're getting Super35 lenses, and secondly I don't believe that's true considering the Fujinon Premista is a PL full frame lens;
I don't recall the PL announcement, but yeah, I've never seen them.
Most sites have eliminated down-voting/neg rep/dislike altogether. And I had gotten plenty of those on soccer forums talking about Freddy Adu too.I was thinking the same thing. I think some people don't like my humor or what can come across as an uppity attitude at times so have taken a habit of down-voting my posts even if they aren't just joke posts as an uncharitable effort to discourage my posting. It would be cool if like FB, Instagram, etc., post voting wasn't anonymous as then people would be less likely to use it just to anonymously jab at someone. Let's hope they find better things to do than belittle people on the Internet who have never meant them any harm...
Yeah, I am kind of seeing the next Arri as the last great traditional sensor tech. Before we start going science fiction.If post focusing capabilities like the Lytro camera ever make it to high end (and low end) cameras, that would be a game changing technology. Even watching big budget movies like Les Miserables, it's not uncommon to see an out of focus shot that distracts the viewer from the story. This would be more of a game changing tech for the high end than auto-focus. Auto-focus can't read the focus puller's mind, but post focusing can.
If post focusing capabilities like the Lytro camera ever make it to high end (and low end) cameras, that would be a game changing technology. Even watching big budget movies like Les Miserables, it's not uncommon to see an out of focus shot that distracts the viewer from the story. This would be more of a game changing tech for the high end than auto-focus. Auto-focus can't read the focus puller's mind, but post focusing can.
Oh, yea - a dream come true.
And there are a lot of missed focus shots in Hollywood. But with fast edits (and people not caring), it doesn't matter much.
But so many times the eyes are just a tad soft and I want to reach into the screen and nudge the lens one way or the other.