dillont
Well-known member
Jay A. Kelley said:Dillont,
I think/hope Jim will agree when I say that RED's goal is NOT to replace film.. It's to offer film makers and various shooters another choice in the tools they use to create their art.
If you see advantages to using RED over traditional film, that's great.. But one does not have to be better than the other for you to make that choice.. We need to respect everyone's position and choice of medium.. It makes for a happier world.
Jay
#327
Hi Jay,
I totally hear where you're coming from, and I agree. I love the organic look and feel of film. It, I think, adds to that magical element of film that we all strive to create.
The RED camera creates an image that is obscenely clean (as I've just witnessed). It's disturbing. My first instinct is "where's the grain!?". My 2nd thought is - wow, I have control over the grain now!
When I buy into the RED system, I'll be keeping this in mind - I'll be adding that flawed filmic look to every frame I create. I love the fact that now I have the option to control that.
I'm sorry. I just grown up since I was a kid, believing and hoping that "video" would some day be a viable alternative to film. That day has come.
No hard feelings
Dillon