Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
These are the tests I want to see. Not fruit in front of a color chart or a girl in front of a bright shop window without proper lighting. All the crap about DR means nothing if the shooter knows what he/she is doing and works with the camera the right way.
Meh, still doesn't beat the hacked GH2 IQ IMO
the first youtube: heres a post and explanationOk...I ll just say my opinion here...and help me god!!!
Im really trying to understand what there is to like in the youtube videos linked in that thread: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5vFk_aSShc and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Da7xy5rZ8OU&feature=youtu.be
The first one is soft, full of noise (and not only in the shadows) with some strange flickering and about the second...I just dont know what to say...what is there to like? The detail in the face? Ok...
Yep. Well said Henry. Everyone is a DoP now...Gulp......and also http://www.dvxuser.com/V6/showthrea...ety-quot-Warner-Bros-buys-Law-Zero-pitch-quot
Seems we live in a time where the reviewer or cam tester or first to get a great video up gets more plaudits than the actual respected real filmmaker sometimes.......weird. Anyway IMHO Macgregor rocks guys.
Nice video by the way - great use of movement. Living in great times
Meh, still doesn't beat the hacked GH2 IQ IMO
Filming surfers is more difficult than you think. believe that!so the guy has some toys and plenty of time....zzzzzz
I guess my point is: Really Cool Video, but it could have been done with a 5d mark 1.
Am I the only one to realize that most of these shots are time lapse. (Very creative and good looking time lapse). But time lapse doesn't actually tell us anything about the quality of video mode. The shots may have even been made from raw and not even jpeg. It looks like the only slow motion shot is the pigeons, which was ok I suppose.
I guess my point is: Really Cool Video, but it could have been done with a 5d mark 1.
John, why are you always belittling people? To answer your rhetorical questions...
1/ 96fps outputs closer to 720 than 1080, and therefore is best used for medium-closeup shots.
2/ Shooters who have tested the camera have found issues with various settings in various situations. It's people like these who allow people like you to get the best out of your camera.
What I don't get is why you feel the need to s*%t on people so relentlessly? Even if you had any talent (I checked your Vimeo page) this would be poor form.
Wow what a nasty comment. Personally, I feel that Macgregor would be able to make a very nice film propaganda film with the GH4 if he chose to![]()
Err - I don't think the movi shots are time lapses. He does state at the front of the video that it's a mixture of 4k and timelapse