David W. Jones
Veteran
If it's not a hardware issue, I would love to see the video out delay much minimized. Right now it's the worst I have seen in any camera.
+1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If it's not a hardware issue, I would love to see the video out delay much minimized. Right now it's the worst I have seen in any camera.
Finally am able to start playing around with my GH4... my request is (assuming it's a software and not a hardware thing) to do away with the 4GB limit on exFAT SDXC cards. I get it for AVCHD, but there is also metadata to string those clips back together in my NLE. The lack of metadata for the 100mbs and 200mbs modes could make this a pain in the rear-end to string along clips during long interviews or events.
Agreed. For event video, I find it easier to deal with AVCHD because it combines all the clips into one long clip in Premiere Pro, making it a lot easier to sync a multi-camera shoot.Finally am able to start playing around with my GH4... my request is (assuming it's a software and not a hardware thing) to do away with the 4GB limit on exFAT SDXC cards. I get it for AVCHD, but there is also metadata to string those clips back together in my NLE. The lack of metadata for the 100mbs and 200mbs modes could make this a pain in the rear-end to string along clips during long interviews or events.
Again, higher bitrates can mean lower CPU load, as the optimization search time is decreased, so the hardware could run cooler. One business reason not to include 200Mbps 4K at launch could be the scarcity of U3 SDXC cards. The only write speed issues I've read about were with 200Mbps 1080p ALL-I (something folks aren't using much as 4K => 1080p offers the best quality (except for fast motion)). It sounds like Panasonic engineering isn't allowed to release much detail to sales & marketing, so we might not know until or if there is a firmware update.
I can.
You have to remember that the data is not being 'thrown out' first, and then the remaining image encoded. The data is being 'thrown out' during the encode process, according to an algorithm. I'll be the first to admit lack of expertise on this subject, but it does seem theoretically sound that 'throwing out' less data would be less computationally expensive, and thus require less processing power, just as throwing out none of it would require the least processing power.
I suggested this in a thread a while back and got absolutely flamed for my views that 4K at 200mbps could be less/no more CPU intensive than 4K at 100Mbps. It became an abomination of a thread, good to hear you views might be the same.
We know that all the Hardware and interfaces can handle 200Mbps so the high data rate is not the issue.
Clients are repeatedly complaining about this very issue.
Oh that was you...I remember that thread but I didn't follow it. Us 200Mb/4K'ers gotta stick together...lol
I'm stressing REASONABLE here, stuff that panny engineers could actually get to us in a future firmware.
1. please make it so aperture, iso, and shutterspeed don't stick to the C1, c2, c3 settings. It's annoying to have exposure dialed in on c1 and then switch to c2 (which I have set for slow motion) and then have to reset the aperture, iso, shutterspeed