GH5 Available for Pre-Order at $2k, amazing features.

Danilo Del Tufo said:
New Panasonic GH5 4k Footage (10bit 422): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Sx9mxSkmb4
Click to expand...

The uploaders comment on youtube when someone told them the footage wasn't shot with a GH5 ' It was, I believe what you're seeing is YouTube compression. '


I'm pretty sure the big guy walking the alley towards the camera at the end is the owner of the video, as I remember he had another youtube page where he'd post "test" videos of RELEASED cameras, and going off what I remember of his videos, there is no way he is a Lumix Ambassador.
 
Last edited:
To say nothing of the wrong northern hemispheric seasons shot or the horrendous compression. *eyeroll*

Several of these really ought to be removed from the thread.
 
Perhaps the concept of making false claims to attract clicks and advertising dollars has now infected camera review videos?
 
Shenan said:
Perhaps the concept of making false claims to attract clicks and advertising dollars has now infected camera review videos?
Click to expand...

I think it would help if some posters watched and thought a bit before blindly linking. A lot of this stuff is just click bait.
 
TFilipiak said:
Hmmm... Dunno if that footage was properly exposed or graded, but the DR doesn't look like it's improved much over the GH4 from what I'm seeing. (?)
Click to expand...

I think over-all DR is identical to the GH4, but noise levels are lower by a stop.
 
Danilo Del Tufo said:
"April Sky" | Shot on the Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5 : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqHX4CAJRG8
Click to expand...

TFilipiak said:
Hmmm... Dunno if that footage was properly exposed or graded, but the DR doesn't look like it's improved much over the GH4 from what I'm seeing. (?)
Click to expand...

IanTheM said:
I think over-all DR is identical to the GH4, but noise levels are lower by a stop.
Click to expand...

The April Sky, and the Christmas videos uploaded by 4KFM probably wasnt shot with a GH5. The guy first said he was given a GH5 by Panasonic, and then when someone called him out he claimed he rented a GH5. Where???

Then when someone asked him to upload a video of himself with the GH5 camera in hand, he said he only had it for a day.

He also has few G80/85 videos listed where he was asked how he got it so soon, and he claimed he rented it, while a couple of the video descriptions stated " shot with my new G80/85 " , and " just got my new G80/85 "
 
lol, just a bundled mess of a variety of links that may or may not have been produced with the GH5.
 
Hahahaha. The Disney post is funny stuff, and is exactly in line with what has been posted here.

The 4KFM guy chose to delete all the comments questioning the validity of his GH5 footage, instead of providing proof. Oh well, the GH5 has brought in click bait season.
 
Yeah, that person clearly can't shoot and there's plenty of problems with their footage, but if that's ISO 1600-6400 I'm blown away by how clean it is. It's also much more detailed than the GH4. That I can discern, even in the mess of amateur video that that link is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top