Picturequest
Well-known member
Could that be an example of shooting with a higher shutter speed? I wonder if you get the jitter at 1/40 or 1/60?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The difference between this first look and those posted prior is in who the author is. Michael Reichmann is an accomplished professional photographer. He is also an experienced equipment reviewer. Personally, I found his to be the best review posted yet, even though it may not have been particularly rich in details "we did not know yet".
Also, I found this footage demonstrating the touchscreen AF speed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GSfi-CgTRak
It appears that autofocus algorithm always tries to focus in the direction of infinity first, so several [noticeable] cycles pass with front flower growing further and further out of focus before direction is switched and proper focus is achieved. Also, the fact of the lens in use "breathing" doesn't help at all. I don't think it is the 14-140, because I hardly notice any breathing on mine.thanks for that.
Slightly disappointing that the focus 'heaves' slightly, every time it reverts back to the nearer (yellow) flower.
It goes from near to 'distant' immediately, but consistently heaves when it returns.
That was one of my pet hates about the GH1 (albeit that I found it to 'heave' when changing any focus point) - anyone speculate about the cause?
It appears that autofocus algorithm always tries to focus in the direction of infinity first, so several [noticeable] cycles pass with front flower growing further and further out of focus before direction is switched and proper focus is achieved. Also, the fact of the lens in use "breathing" doesn't help at all. I don't think it is the 14-140, because I hardly notice any breathing on mine.
Easy...Read the review of the NEX 5.Here's a small challenge while you're waiting for a useful GH2 review - find *any* Luminous Landscape' review that *seriously* criticises *any* camera.......
Easy...Read the review of the NEX 5.
"So – I wish that I could say – "run about and buy a NEX-5 if any of these features appeals to you". But in all good conscience I can't. The NEX-5's user interface may well be one of the most frustrating that I have ever encountered. ... it would be too frustrating to use on an everyday basis. Kind of like the beautiful girl who really attracts you, but then when she opens her mouth speaks in a shrill and annoying voice while blowing bubble gum. Ummm, no thanks. "
OK, what do I win??
We've already done that one! - although the young lady is, apparently, not Mr Reichmann's cup of tea, he still goes on to recommend her to everyone else
My initial impression of the NEX-5 was positive...
...and indeed it remains so if I adopt the perspective of a photographic neophyte.For the newcomer to photography, or someone stepping up from a point-and-shoot, the NEX-5 is a terrific camera, offering small size and weight, very good image quality, and ease of use.
But for the photographer who is already familiar with the basics of their craft, and who wants a tool that they can grow with, the NEX-5 seems to put up too many road blocks.
So – I wish that I could say – "run about and buy a NEX-5 if any of these features appeals to you". But in all good conscience I can't. The NEX-5's user interface may well be one of the most frustrating that I have ever encountered.
So what's your problem with this gentleman? Did the reviewer insult you at some point or are your reading skills impaired?
That was your reply to me earlier. But that is not the whole story. In fact the next sentence squarely contradicts you:
Followed by:
So how about you take your own prize and stay out of Mr Reichmann's blog until you can improve your cognitive skills.