eheath
Well-known member
So I own a fs100 and use about 6 nikon lenses, two of them being G lenses made to operate with nikon bodies. I have a canon 40D, but no canon lenses (sold the kit lens) and im sick of using an adapter (currently dont have one too) and figured i'd sell it and buy a nikon body for taking photos when i want to.
I then realize that nikon had recently came out with 3 cameras with 1080p24, the d3100/d5100/d7000, having this could make for a very decent Bcam.
Now, ive been doing some research and the more i read the more upset i get. I have read the d3100/d5100 are worthless for any serious video because you cant control the exposure in live view. I've also heard the d7000 has a few minor problems (doesn't have true live view? is this true?). I think im definitely getting a nikon body, old or new, so i can take photos, but im trying to decide if i should spend the extra 4-500 dollars for the d7000 over the d3100/d5100/d90/other older nikon body.
I can definitely afford the d7000, but its like "oh if i save 500 on that camera i have 500 for something else" kind of thing. what do you guys think? ive heard ALOT of great things about the photos out of the d7000 too, which makes me lean towards on bailing on the 3100/5100 and going with the d7000, but i just wanna make sure everything i have heard is correct.
thanks,
evan
I then realize that nikon had recently came out with 3 cameras with 1080p24, the d3100/d5100/d7000, having this could make for a very decent Bcam.
Now, ive been doing some research and the more i read the more upset i get. I have read the d3100/d5100 are worthless for any serious video because you cant control the exposure in live view. I've also heard the d7000 has a few minor problems (doesn't have true live view? is this true?). I think im definitely getting a nikon body, old or new, so i can take photos, but im trying to decide if i should spend the extra 4-500 dollars for the d7000 over the d3100/d5100/d90/other older nikon body.
I can definitely afford the d7000, but its like "oh if i save 500 on that camera i have 500 for something else" kind of thing. what do you guys think? ive heard ALOT of great things about the photos out of the d7000 too, which makes me lean towards on bailing on the 3100/5100 and going with the d7000, but i just wanna make sure everything i have heard is correct.
thanks,
evan