Tests with production AF100

Ticheli

Well-known member
We're well along in our tests with our production AF100 and will upload the files for evaluation by those interested.

So far I've shot grey scale, resolution, & pretty girl charts, and a table-top at Cine V, Cine D, and HD Norm. There is absolutely NO visible noise on the studio monitor SDI out nor in the footage in the FC timeline, even with the brightness on the monitor turned all the way up. No discernible noise. None.

A pleasant surprise was the greatly reduced compression artifacts with the frames blown up to 200% and 400%; I'm not saying these are usable by any means, but the pre-production camera looked much worse with the blow-ups.

We are shooting Film Like with Detail at -7, Chroma -2, Coring +2, and Pedestal at -2.

Unfortunately, it's a rainy day here, so we probably will not be able to shoot any exteriors; we did, however, shoot the test charts under both tungsten and daylight. I could not readily detect any difference by looking at the studio monitor, but closer examination may reveal something. I certainly did not see anything that would lead me to believe that tungsten was obviously inferior.

Forgive me for waxing poetic, but this little camera reminds me of a Mini Cooper; it does a great many things very well and it really a lot of fun; it's not a Lotus, it's not a Van, but you're smiling all the way.

Stay tuned; we'll make all our settings and footage available soon.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 
Forgive me for waxing poetic, but this little camera reminds me of a Mini Cooper; it does a great many things very well and it really a lot of fun; it's not a Lotus, it's not a Van, but you're smiling all the way.

Leo

No need for forgiveness. Poetry in pictures is what we strive for. :beer: Thanks for taking the time.
 
Thanks Leo.
I'll be getting familiar with mine this weekend as delivery is Friday.
Sure hope the wife has something interesting to do.

All the Best!

Dave
 
First stills from today's tests...

First stills from today's tests...

Film Like with Detail at -7, V Detail -7, Chroma -2, Coring +2, and Pedestal at -2.

I must say the differences are subtile.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 

Attachments

  • Cine Like V.jpg
    Cine Like V.jpg
    117.6 KB · Views: 0
  • Cine Like D.jpg
    Cine Like D.jpg
    108.4 KB · Views: 0
  • hd norm.jpg
    hd norm.jpg
    114 KB · Views: 0
Cine Like D's always been my favorite for the HVX200 and the HPX500. Any quick results with resolution? I've heard 800 lines - which is a little disappointing - but to be expected with the Bayer pattern.
 
So take a look up at the area to the left top and top of the red dice. In all three images I see a lot of greenish/red in that area, yet everywhere else it looks really good. Less pronounced in the Cine-V. What does that area do during video?
 
Last edited:
cine-D for my tastes. Better treatment of upper mid to light values. Better fall off on the crayons, detail on the whites of the card, the queen, and the chips.
 
Correction: the V Detail is actually at -4, not -7. More stills in a moment, motion probably tomorrow.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 
Peppers...

Peppers...

By the way, these are all straight from the FC timeline; no grading.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 

Attachments

  • peppers cine d.jpg
    peppers cine d.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 0
  • peppers hd norm.jpg
    peppers hd norm.jpg
    45.7 KB · Views: 0
  • peppers cine v.jpg
    peppers cine v.jpg
    46 KB · Views: 0
So take a look up at the area to the left top and top of the red dice. In all three images I see a lot of greenish/red in that area, yet everywhere else it looks really good. Less pronounced in the Cine-V. What does that area do during video?

We're not seeing anything there, still or video. My chief editor suggested you degauss your monitor! Ha! Shows how old-school we are!

Everyone has their personal preference, but I'm really leaning toward HD Norm for most shots, but really the deciding factor will be the flexibility in grading. One thing is for sure, Cine D is much kinder as you approach clip; even then you've got to be very careful.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 
Pretty face; low light...

Pretty face; low light...

Only one small incandescent bulb.

This is where Cine D & V seem to have quite an edge.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo
 

Attachments

  • low light girl cine hd norm.jpg
    low light girl cine hd norm.jpg
    25.9 KB · Views: 0
  • low light girl cine d.jpg
    low light girl cine d.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 0
  • low light girl cine v.jpg
    low light girl cine v.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 0
We're not seeing anything there, still or video. My chief editor suggested you degauss your monitor! Ha! Shows how old-school we are!

Everyone has their personal preference, but I'm really leaning toward HD Norm for most shots, but really the deciding factor will be the flexibility in grading. One thing is for sure, Cine D is much kinder as you approach clip; even then you've got to be very careful.

Good shooting and best regards,

Leo

I used to degauss my monitor back when I had a MAG :) I just loved that sound.

Well that is odd, because I see those colors clear as day on my monitor here. Makes the gray cloth look like it has oil on it almost.
 
Back
Top