Sony announces FX9 4K camcorder with 6K fullframe sensor

Or you might be like me and not give a toss if my mirrorless and A camera match. I know its important for certain situations for the cameras to match but it is more fun to try a mixed media approach sometimes too.
 
You dislike Canon, lol.

Just to be crystal clear...Canon dominates any and all professional photography in the world. There's no comparison.

But for video, I would agree more people are using Sony mirrorless cameras.

For one of our largest clients we shoot their commercials, & stills campaigns, at the same time. First we’ll film part of the commercial, & then the corresponding stills, then back to the commercial, & again with the stills. Rinse & repeat. This is dictated by the ‘talent’ scheduling.

What kills me is the Alexas we use for the commercials have so much more dynamic range then the Canons we use for the stills, so I’m keeping an eye out for whatever Sony releases to replace the A9.
 
Last edited:
I think the Sonys have been more than ready for a few years now, but you just can't move mountains...it's a standard and/or stigma that will not change until an entire generation or two expires.

Same with motion pictures and ARRI vs. everything else.

As life moves on maybe there will be changes.
 
As far as conversion buyers from the C300 MKII, EVA 1, UMP G2 and C200, I guess it will just depend on what those users market is.

Those cameras totally have their markets and some unique features. If you need tiny form factor, or you need Raw in a run-n-gun package, those cameras are designed to meet certain needs. Whereas the FS7/FX9 are the cameras to buy if you don't know what to buy; they are a pretty safe bet.

In real world production, in most markets, almost nobody is going to not hire you because you have a FX9 (even if they want Red/Arri they're probably renting one anyway), but the same cannot be said of those other cameras above.
 
We still don't know the most important thing about the Fx9:

Does the darn tally-light remain on screen when you turn off the rest of the display?
 
Getting off-topic(shocker here, right?), but Betacam SX was not what I’d call short lived or missing the mark, at least not in the US. It was a pretty good hit with news stations and even some networks(I know CBS used it). Image was good and you could use either SX tapes of Beta SP(and get double the record time).

Yes when I say short lived I guess I mean relative to analogue Beta. One of our networks in Australia, Network TEN went 100% with it for the ENG work. Five years later nobody really wanted it. For news because of the low data load it was great for live links. Any heavy serious post work with it though and you were struggling. Sony loaned my business two VTRs and a camera for 90 days to see if it would suit our production requirements but it couldn't compete with Digi Beta or DVC Pro 50. The cameras were great as the front ends were the same as the Digi Beta cams so visually the quality was great. Just didn't like them in post.

Chris Young
 
"the FS7/FX9 are the cameras to buy if you don't know what to buy; they are a pretty safe bet. "
Perhaps because the hiring appendages don't know either.
 
Yes when I say short lived I guess I mean relative to analogue Beta. One of our networks in Australia, Network TEN went 100% with it for the ENG work. Five years later nobody really wanted it. For news because of the low data load it was great for live links. Any heavy serious post work with it though and you were struggling. Sony loaned my business two VTRs and a camera for 90 days to see if it would suit our production requirements but it couldn't compete with Digi Beta or DVC Pro 50. The cameras were great as the front ends were the same as the Digi Beta cams so visually the quality was great. Just didn't like them in post.

Chris Young

Yeah, in quick-turn news, post wasn’t much of an issue. It was generally either being cut straight tape-to-tape in the field or ingested into an NLE and cut and spit right back out in the studio. And back then, most of the photogs still knew how to WB and expose, too. A much simpler time...

I will say though, that trying to cue up a tape from a full shuttle was damn near impossible.
 
I will say though, that trying to cue up a tape from a full shuttle was damn near impossible.

Know where you are coming from. Talking about cueing up I fought for weeks trying to get Panasonic DVCPro VTRs to cue up frame accurately with Sony BVE-910 and 2000 Edit controllers. They refused to be frame accurate. I spent many dog hours adjusting the HEX codes in the BVE setup software, something like 16 pairs of HEX ballistic codes. Finally I got it right and had 100% frame accurate insert editing. Panasonic Australia told me other post hoses were having the same issues and could I supply them the new HEX stings for DVC Pro decks to work with Sony edit controllers, "Yes"I said. About two weeks later a Panasonic factory bulletin out of Japan was issued outlining the HEX strings to be used when using DVC Pro decks with Sony controllers. "Hmm!" I thought "I've seen these somewhere else before." Exactly the same HEX strings I gave Panasonic Australia :)

Chris Young
 
The Arri Alexa uses SxS cards and they don't seem to officially support the SxS adapter for XQD cards:
https://forum.arri.com/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=147

The Alexa Mini and Amira use CFast 2.0 cards.

In addition to Sony which used XQD cards in the FS7, FS7 mkII, and a couple of their early 4K camcorders, the PXW-Z100 and FDR-AX1, Nikon bet pretty big on XQD. The Nikon D5, D500, D850, Z6, and Z7 all have XQD card slots. Panasonic also included an XQD card slot in the S1 and S1R, although they kind of split the difference with one SD card slot and one XQD and then went with dual SD slots in the S1H.

I'm not sure why they didn't include CFexpress support in the FX9 though. CFexpress type B cards are the same connector type and dimensions as XQD, so it is possible for a camera to accept both types of cards for compatibility. And CFexpress definitely seems to be the future as it allows for significantly faster cards. The recently announced SanDisk CFexpress cards are faster without being any more expensive than existing XQD cards. Plus, they have a 512GB card which is a larger capacity than the biggest XQD card (256 GB) currently available and is actually less expensive per GB than the smaller cards:
https://www.cinema5d.com/sandisk-cfexpress-ultra-fast-cards-now-available-for-pre-order

I suppose it's possible that the FX9 eventually gets a firmware update that enables CFexpress support, as in some cases this is doable through a firmware change. It's also possible that Sony wants to sell their own XQD media, since they are one of the few manufacturers of XQD cards, and Sony doesn't have any CFexpress cards on the market yet. Sony did announce the development of a CFexpress card earlier this year, but it doesn't actually seem to be available yet despite the claim that it would be ready by summer 2019: https://pro.sony/ue_US/press/cfexpress

Surprising to hear that XQD cards are limited to 256GB currently. Tough to shoot long interviews and docs without constantly worrying about card getting over at the most inappropriate time. What is the booting time of FX9? Or you just change cards without switching off?

Good thing about CFExpress is that higher capacities will soon come. Already Canon is giving a 512GB free with C500II. I am sure 1 TB and more when it comes will be very helpful.
 
Surprising to hear that XQD cards are limited to 256GB currently. Tough to shoot long interviews and docs without constantly worrying about card getting over at the most inappropriate time. What is the booting time of FX9? Or you just change cards without switching off?

Good thing about CFExpress is that higher capacities will soon come. Already Canon is giving a 512GB free with C500II. I am sure 1 TB and more when it comes will be very helpful.

I record a lot of long form interviews with my FS7 and have not found the XQD size limitations to be a problem. I usually go to a shoot with six 128GB XQD cards and since the FS7 (and now FX9) have two card slots, I load two up at a time and use relay recording. When card 1 fills up, it automatically records to card 2 without losing a single frame. I then hot swap and remove card 1 during recording and replace it with a new card, all while card 2 is still recording. This process works very well and allows you to record until the end of time if needed haha.

Also, the FS7 records 4K 24p at 240Mbps, so a 128GB card can hold like 40 something minutes of record time. That's pretty solid. When I shoot TED Talks I use the above process and it works very well. I can fit 10-12 Talks plus performances that happen in between the Talks into around 5 cards usually.
 
The long-long form solution I’ve used for years when renting is a Ninja recorder. The V makes a pretty decent monitor for oldish eyes as well.
 
I'd like to know more about the upcoming FX9. Did someone test the camera on the shoulder? Never used a FS7, but I've noticed a change under the camera, the recess for the shoulder seem to be gone or is very hidden in pictures or videos that I've watched. Someone said it's more comfortable to hold with the shoulder than FS7, but I'd like to know if there's still a little of shoulder's recess, to accomodate the camera well on the shoulder. Thanks!
 
I'd like to know more about the upcoming FX9. Did someone test the camera on the shoulder? Never used a FS7, but I've noticed a change under the camera, the recess for the shoulder seem to be gone or is very hidden in pictures or videos that I've watched. Someone said it's more comfortable to hold with the shoulder than FS7, but I'd like to know if there's still a little of shoulder's recess, to accomodate the camera well on the shoulder. Thanks!

I noticed the disappearance of the shoulder cut-out as well. That cut-out on the Fs7 allowed the camera to more sit "down" on your shoulder than other cameras, if you used a shoulder-plate such as the Chrosziel plate that followed the contour of the bottom of the Fs7.



I do like that on the Fx9 the point where the cable attaches to the LCD is angled towards the direction from which the cable approaches [ image below ]. It still is not detachable, something I would prefer because it allows you to replace the cable alone should it go bad and not have to send off the entire LCD along with it for repair. I read that the Fx9's focus mag is much better than on the Fs7 and less becomes blocky / pixelated when using the image magnification to check focus.


Congrats dmitrizigany on your pre-order commitment! I'm right there on the cusp of taking the plunge myself.


Screen Shot 2019-09-19 at 11.15.51 AM.jpg
 
Everyone has a decent wait...at least 4 months.

Potentially longer if you do not pre-order. When the Fs7 was released I had difficulty finding any retailer that had one in stock. I did happen upon one rather quickly. But others had to wait several more months after the official release date.
 
Don't you hate it when you accidently hit the order button? Now you are just going to have to go ahead and keep it :Drogar-BigGrin(DBG)
Yes, hate it when it happens! :)

It is cancellable and refundable though, so commitment isn’t that bad. I can still chicken out.
 
I'd like to know more about the upcoming FX9. Did someone test the camera on the shoulder?
I tried it. Haven’t used the FS7 enough to really tell the difference though. And as there were cables attached (power etc) and no battery, it was kinda hard to get a feel for how it would really be to use...
 
Back
Top