G
Guest
Guest
People often like to use the phrase "size matters" when referring to sensor size, as their main interest is shallow dof.
But I find FF focal length standards of 20, 28, 35, 50, 85 to be somewhat awkward, when mounted on APS-C/H (1.6x crop, s35) cameras. They are often too cropped or not wide enough.
For example, the 50mm is too cropped for most practical situations, and when it is used for closeups, it doesn't have enough reach for a good impacting close up, and requires the operator to get closer to the subject, but then unflattering distortion begins to take place. And I am not even talking about extreme close ups either. But the 85mm is too far reaching, and requires impractical distance from subject, and is also limited to tripod use typically.
Does anybody find these focal lengths to be better on a 2x crop m4/3 sensor?
But I find FF focal length standards of 20, 28, 35, 50, 85 to be somewhat awkward, when mounted on APS-C/H (1.6x crop, s35) cameras. They are often too cropped or not wide enough.
For example, the 50mm is too cropped for most practical situations, and when it is used for closeups, it doesn't have enough reach for a good impacting close up, and requires the operator to get closer to the subject, but then unflattering distortion begins to take place. And I am not even talking about extreme close ups either. But the 85mm is too far reaching, and requires impractical distance from subject, and is also limited to tripod use typically.
Does anybody find these focal lengths to be better on a 2x crop m4/3 sensor?

