Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
| IMPORTANT NOTICE: No media files are hosted on these forums. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website. We can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. If the video does not play, wait a minute or try again later. |
| I AGREE |
In no possible way would it be a firmware update. We are talking about new hardware necessary, a proper downscaling chip.Do you foresee this happening as a firmware update for the 7D, or will it possibly be in a new camera system altogether?
There's no reason the Scarlet couldn't rival the Red One. The trade-in program "protects" red one owners by giving them a path to the higher end product.People are acting like Scarlet will rival RED ONE, I doubt that, unlike Canon and Nikon, they have to protect their high end line.
Well, yes, there I'd agree -- they'd better offer something substantially better with the Epic if they want to justify the increased price.There has to be significant daylight between Epic and Scarlet in terms of IQ.
There's no reason the Scarlet couldn't rival the Red One.
Sell your 7D to me. You know the Scarlet is going to be so AMAZING. Srsly. K thx.
I'm going to have to disagree with you there. As a few here (most notably Kholi, I think) have noted, one of the biggest things standing in the way of traditional-form camcorders with APS-C chips is the non-existence of fully-servo-driven AF lenses that are sufficiently fast (both in terms of aperture and focusing speed). Those are the kind of lenses that broadcast professionals expect, not still photo lenses. Remember that Panasonic reportedly spent several months optimizing the GH1 kit lens for video use, and it's still not a real "video lens." So I can't imagine that designing such lenses would be as easy as sticking an APS-C sensor inside of a traditional camcorder body.
In 6 months time, I expect the 7D owners will be kicking themselves and thinking 'why didn't I wait'? Unless that is you produce amazing footage with it until then, which I am sure you all will, and which I am sure is worth more than the camera to you.
In 6 months time, I expect the 7D owners will be kicking themselves and thinking 'why didn't I wait'?
$3,000 isn't a Scarlet, that's a ... Pink... or something. Puce. Maybe orange. It's not even scarlet.Common sense is the reason. A R1 is still a $25,000 camera that producers a killer, film comparable image. I don't believe for a second that the same company will release something nearly as good, as good, or BETTER for $3,000.
Well, the Red One isn't their flagship model, it's their only model. And it's not going to be the flagship the second the Epic is released. There's a reason they're offering the Epic-X upgrade program after all. Obsolescence may be obsolete, but probably not with the Red One, I think every One owner is going to be strongly encouraged to get on the DSMC bandwagon. I don't think Red views the Red One as the future, that's the past and the present but not the future; they're engineering everything around the modular DSMC concept. I think Jim's already gone on record saying something like "any Red One owner who hasn't ordered an Epic-X is going to be kicking themselves" or something like that.I've never seen a quantum leap like that in price/performance metrics. Red isn't going to shoot themselves in the foot by releasing a $3,000 camera that's better than their flagship model which will be with us for a long time no doubt.