kyle.presley
Well-known member
Haha, I never thought of that! I'll have to pass that on to him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
While I liked the authenticity of this piece, a throwback to the prime spaghetti western days, for me that served as more of a distraction than anything else. Take away the window dressing and we're left with a film that has pacing issues, disjointed editing and a feel of a not complete film that took too long to develop. Some of these issue could have been dealt with in the scripting or in the editing, focusing on the shots which really tell the story and get to the heart of it. That being said it was quite a nice experience and you captured the vintage feel very well. I just would have liked to have seen a film that was solid and stodd on it's own on film... or in supersharp HD.
I'm sorry it didn't jive with you, Rodney. I stand by my film, I think for what it is, it works. Why do you think it took too long to develop? Why did the style being a spaghetti western distract you? And why do you consider the style to be "window dressing"? I think it's a legitimate experiment, that does stand on it's own. The spaghetti western is it's own sub-genre. To be able to appreciate the film, you have to embrace the spirit of it. Embrace the spirit, and you will find the heart. This isn't "2001: A Space Odyssey," or "Casablanca." This was a six minute venture into the conventions of the Italian Western with a fun character and a certain amount of conflict. It has a main character that is dynamic, it has a beginning, a middle, and an end. It has rising action, climax, and resolution, and (what I think to be) a nifty little punch-line. It's a bit odd doing an homage film, I didn't make creative decisions based on my own personal taste or style, but rather what was dictated to me by the conventions of 40 years old European films! How many older movies do you watch that aren't paced quite right? Where the editing is a bit rough around the edges? There are tons, and that's the point of this film. It's not meant to be "genius" or what some may call "polished". It is what it is and I stand by it. Watch any old Italian Western (forget Leone, he was the grand master), but the ones that predate the "Man without a Name" trilogy. You will see a little better into what I was trying to accomplish here, I think. Thank you for your critique, though. I appreciate it. :thumbsup: