Contact_Therapy
Well-known member
I'm wondering why this unit and the Ki Pro mini only use Pro Res 422. Would be great if they had a codec that I could use with Premiere.
Apparently, CS5 supports ProResHQ
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm wondering why this unit and the Ki Pro mini only use Pro Res 422. Would be great if they had a codec that I could use with Premiere.
Awesome! Thanks...
Looks like HDMI out is really a reality for this camera. Way to 1-up the competition Panasonic.
(actually more like 8-up)
Anyone see this video yet?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2eBL4LXsxU&feature=player_embedded
That's some fast AF!
Sorry...I also have to comment about:
"Panasonic is listening for the wishes of the customers. But intentionally not communicating these wishes in forums."
Ha ha...yes they did indirectly...the gift of version 1.34.
Also a talked about the rather low bps rates compared to the hacked rates and the production manager said, that Panasonic has to watch the compatibility chain to the TV sets. You shall be able to put the SD card fro the camcorder into the Panasonic TV and it shall just work.
Figured it was for broad compatibility. That's what standards are for.
Still, I wish they would at least give advanced users the option of setting higher bitrates and progressive recording. Just make it clear that those recordings may not play properly on all devices.
Anyone see this video yet?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2eBL4LXsxU&feature=player_embedded
That's some fast AF!
Impressive. Taken with the ability to touch screen focus, it certainly adds lot of creative options when shooting video that would other wise be not easy with manual focusing without adding shake.
Apparently, CS5 supports ProResHQ
Sorry, but I´m still a bit confused about this 1080i50 thing. What you´re going to get if you make a deinterlacing of that footage? 1080p50? 1080p25? 540p25?.......?
It is extra risky in practice. AF can start hunting or misses focus, and you have real problem. But for normal life it is good solution.
FF with predefined points must be added in firmware update.
That AF speed demo is in photo mode, not video.
true 540p50, or bad 1080p25 (2 half-pictures at 2 different times mixed together)
There are some good deinterlace solutions, so yes, you aren't stuck with a half loss in quality, but there will be some.Thanks divide - but hmm... in old pal times a tool like "fieldskit" made a really good job of deinterlacing from 50i to 25p. Sorry, if this has already been discussed (I didn´t follow the whole thread) but what´s now the main difference?
There are some good deinterlace solutions, so yes, you aren't stuck with a half loss in quality, but there will be some.
I was wondering what would prevent Panny to add this AF performance to GH1? Less processing power of GH1 (?) or marketing strategy? The lens is obviously not the factor.
Agree that a pro would rather trust follow focus to the machine AF. As you said, for normal use it will still have its uses. When it can nail it correctly, sudden shift of focus between subjects far apart would look cool, compared to the progressive change of focus.