Final Cut ProSumer?

I think Phillip ignores major parts of the FCP history along with historical behavior and attitudes Apple and SJ have ehibited in the past. Apple picked up the FCP product because Time and time again Jobs mantra is "Applications sell hardware". To the point they have created the App store and iTunes/iMovies. At the time apple picked up FCP there was a statistic out that went some thing like 3 out of 5 of the colored imacs were being bundled with a copy of premiere. With the impending switch to OSX and the Avid threat of a complete switch over apple wanted to make sure they had an app that would keep the hardware sells going. they couldn't do it in the business community against Microsoft but in the creative community they already had serious clout and fabase. Add to that the his then recent stint in the entertainment industry with pixar and disney he knew there was a digital revolution in full swing. Apple capitalized on all that and created the Pro Application division. To make sure that they could have continued apps to drive hardware sales. A second theme to SJ and Apples way of business is, if its too hard for the average common man to work it needs to be redesigned. He's done this time and time again. computers and applications are not for the elite and the hand few ... it is for the masses or its not good technology. Last thing is you have to factor Steve's own personal desires and opinions into any Apple product. If he is not inspired or see a value in the product it has much less push. Apple is still a company driven by one man. He was the creator, and their savior ... If he sees a "better" vision of the future, that is the path the company will take. If an easier more for the masses interface that works better with the iPhone and iPad can be done with FCP then that is the path that they will take. Any one who makes their living will just have to go with the ride. Other than FCP none of their other products have really taken hold and become entrenched. Motion is too complicated for the casual user and too weak for a real compositor. Logic has no usurped Pro Tools, DVD studio has no fan boys walking around with glazed eyes. There is no real reason for the FCP develpoment to slow down they way it has. the switch in development from the early days to what is now happening is unprecedented in apple for an "important" product. Whether FCP as we know it is dead either because they no longer see a value in it of becuse it will be reborn as some thing completely new remains to be seen. I personally think the real question is, what for will it be when its reborn, a true professionals application or an "App" that sells well by geniuses in apple stores.
 
I think pieces of the iMovie interface with Final Cut pro functionality would be great. iMovie has an elegant way of handling somethings, it just doesn't work when you start to get into the nuts and bolts.
 
This may be a completely ignorant question, but what is so special about FCP becoming 64 bit?

I really enjoy using FCP 7 and don't ever sit there bashing my keyboard with issues. What am I missing?
 
I know a number of editors who would like to see the interface totally overhauled to eliminate the vestiges of the program's Linux underpinnings.

Blasphemy.

What makes me a little bit afraid that this could be true is what happened with Shake. Apple essentially killed a top notch compositing application for seemingly no reason.

P.S. OS X = Unix
 
I highly doubt it...first of all I don't buy that they sell more copies of express than studio and would like to see stats on that...even if they do I doubt they make more money off express. Furthermore, Jobs himself has said that they're not looking to cut out the pro end, and that the people that were let go were not from engineering. Lastly this particular guy on AppleInsider is known for inaccurate, unsubstantiated, outlandish stuff.
 
What makes me a little bit afraid that this could be true is what happened with Shake. Apple essentially killed a top notch compositing application for seemingly no reason.

Yeah that was a bit disconcerting...I think it was because it didn't sell that well and the integrated a lot of the functions into Motion and Color....I mean not all of the deeper compositing stuff but some of the simple stuff.
 
Did Phil that or did Frank Glencairn:

http://frankglencairn.wordpress.com...mer-why-apple-insider-couldn’t-be-more-wrong/

I don't see any attribution in either post.

Philip did - I filed it under "Guest Article" but forgot to link it, cause I was interrupted by a phone call (yeah I know, don`t talk and type).

I fixed it immediately after someone gave me a heads up.



By the way, this here is straight from the horses mouth (one of the comments on Philip`s article):

" As one of the laid-off FCP employees, I can confirm that the new FCP will indeed be a simplified, iMovie-like interface with many fewer features than the current app, and specifically aimed at the prosumer customer, who Apple sees as a growing market segment (as opposed to the stagnant professional high end of the business). When Apple officially says (via Bill Evans, Steve Jobs and others) that the next FCP will be “awesome” and that “pro customers will love it,” they aren’t necessarily lying. But they certainly are OPINING. They may be deluding themselves, but they seem to believe that most pros will accept a simplified interface based on the iMovie model, with far fewer features than the current FCP. Maybe they’re right. Time will tell."
http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/05/18/why-apple-insider-couldnt-be-more-wrong/

Frank
 
Philip did - I filed it under "Guest Article" but forgot to link it, cause I was interrupted by a phone call (yeah I know, don`t talk and type).

I fixed it immediately after someone gave me a heads up.



By the way, this here is straight from the horses mouth (one of the comments on Philip`s article):


http://www.philiphodgetts.com/2010/05/18/why-apple-insider-couldnt-be-more-wrong/

Frank

As a veteran of several industries going through transition, I can attest that the LEAST reliable source for company motivations and future direction is the LAID OFF employee. To the laid off employee, the decisions that lead to their termination will almost always lead to nothing but negative outcomes for whatever they were working on at the time of their termination.

Let's wait an see, shall we?
 
. . . I can attest that the LEAST reliable source for company motivations and future direction is the LAID OFF employee. . . .
You might be right about that, but the first runnerup in least reliable might be the CEO saying the next release will be "awesome."
 
You might be right about that, but the first runnerup in least reliable might be the CEO saying the next release will be "awesome."

lol indeed. i recall a certain software whizkid saying something to the effect of '640K ought to be enough for anybody'
 
Even if this is true, does anyone really think Apple would confirm it?

Someone from Apple already did:

“Final Cut Pro is the first choice for professional video editors, and we’ve never been more excited about its future,” Apple spokesman Bill Evans told CNET. “The next version of Final Cut is going to be awesome, and our pro customers are going to love it.”


 
Back
Top