I am in pre-pro on a no-budget independent feature, and so I looked at cams. I chose the GH3. I looked at the AC line, but the 160a/130a is too much $ for what you get IMHO. For that money, I'd sooner get the FS100 - and you can buy ND filters. But that's still simply too much money. The only other option was the AC90 - I actually like it a lot more than the AC160a, and think it's a much, much MUCH better bang for the buck, and frankly more technically advanced... I particularly liked the stabilization that works brilliantly.
If you can find workarounds for your sound issues with the GH3, then I think that would be your best bet (for me sound is not an issue, as I run it separately from the camera). The GH3 is much more flexible, though it demands a bit more pre-planning.
If you can find workarounds for your sound issues with the GH3, then I think that would be your best bet (for me sound is not an issue, as I run it separately from the camera). The GH3 is much more flexible, though it demands a bit more pre-planning.
Last edited: