Camera industry in the 21st-digital-century... vs smartphone market's advent

A Palo Alto-based startup called Light ... has developed camera technology for phone makers that will allow their devices to do true optical zoom, have good low-light performance and get high-resolution photos that are on par with DSLR cameras...


The way Light’s camera technology works is by placing multiple cameras on the back of a phone — around 6 or 11 cameras. Light stitches together all those images with its software to come out with high-resolution photos. Depending on how many cameras the phone maker chooses, it can achieve between 32 megapixels and 52 megapixels...

http://www.forbes.com/sites/aaronti...-dslr-quality-camera-in-your-next-smartphone/
 
Who wants 4K flicks??? At home or on the go?

Western Digital has a Vidity hard drive ready that is ready for storing Hollywood's movies in the highest quality available, and playing them back on compatible screens. Right now the list of compatible devices is limited to Samsung's UHD TVs (2014 or 2015) with the M-Go app, and Fox is the first studio out of the gate with compatible movies. WD's $90 1TB, USB 3.0-connected My Passport Cinema drive meets the spec, is being packed in free with new Samsung TVs ...

http://www.engadget.com/2015/08/04/...d_Classic&utm_campaign=Engadget&ncid=rss_semi

Basically, a download service to a copy protected hard drive.
 
Tweaktown looks like a quality site. Nice info on the Verizon's projected 80 Gb fiber network, new 16 nM LG chip, Snapdragon 820, Grand Theft Auto sales numbers (54 million copies resulting ~ $3.3B total volume), report that ~ $22B was "lost" due to the ad blockers, a new 4K AMOLED screen with a 774 PPI resolution from EDO, lots of VR news.
 
Videocameras should shake out into four bodies, one consumer and three pros:
  1. Cell phone. Consumers will not buy any more cameras, unless they're into photography.
  2. DSLR. Hobbyists, pros undercover or travelling light, students, people on tight budgets. If NDs and XLRs somehow, this is all I want.
  3. Handicam. Pros who shoot weddings and other events and want to keep their subjects looking natural. My second choice, if done well --- which it hasn't yet.
  4. Shoulder. Pros with a large lens, lots of audio gear strapped on (shotgun, handheld, wireless), or who don't care about sticking out in a crowd.
All the weird ones, like the Blackmagic 4K, Sony FS700, F3, etc., should go the way of the Dodo Bird. The problem with those is that they wanted to be either DSLRs or Handicams but are too big and heavy for that class. The DSLR and Handicam categories have very tight tolerances, and if you can't make it, you should just turn it into the next level. For example, the Blackmagic 4K is trying to be a DSLR. But that class shouldn't be more than a pound or two and no bigger than a GH4 or something. Can't swing it? Turn it into a handicam. Likewise, the FS700 is trying to be a handicam but that class falls apart above five pounds (including battery, lens, screen, etc.). Should have just made it a shoulder cam. This is why I doubt the Ursa Mini will be used as a handicam too, though it's ever so close. With battery and lens it will tip the scale, and people will either use it on the shoulder or develop Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Seriously??? Those ones you listed as disliking I see as being ones of the very best.
As for many of us S35 is the holy grail, but its cost is waaaay out of reach. Not to mention it is a pain to use.

BMPC4K / FS700 / F3 all bring us to very very very close to S35 film quality! At a tiny fraction of its cost. And is often in ways much better than S35 film! (Such as lowlight, or high speed filming, or instant playback)
 
This piece is about a month old. Uhm ... 11K, here it comes.

http://bgr.com/2015/07/11/samsung-11k-display/

Samsung is teaming up with upwards of 13 companies, both foreign and domestic, in a collaborative effort to bring a prototype 11k display to mobile devices by 2018. Yes, you read that correctly: 11k...

With most people still getting accustomed to 4k HDTV sets, putting 11k into perspective is probably a good idea. First off, 11k would result in an insanely high resolution of 2250 pixels per inch. By way of contrast, the incredible Retina Display on the iPhone 6 Plus packs a pixel density of 401. So yeah, we’re effectively talking about what amounts to an incomprehensible number of pixels on a device you can hold in your hand...
 
Leading semiconductor solutions provider Broadcom Corporation BRCM, recently introduced upgraded system-on-a-chip (SoC) for its mid-range cable and IPTV set-top box devices to provide content more efficiently to subscribers globally.

The new chips integrate Broadcoms's 10-bit High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) technology, which is likely to result in a 50% reduction in bandwidth for a similar video quality. With the increasing use of cloud based all-IP video delivery, reduction in bandwidth costs is one of the most important requirements for operators. The new devices are expected to reduce bandwidth costs significantly.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/broadcom-introduces-hevc-chips-set-155003277.html

HEVC should potentially allow the doubling of the channels in the digital cable universe and/or appearance of some/more 4K channels.

PS. On the related note, there was a USA Today editorial today (or is that redundant today?) with the strongly worded opinion that the FCC ought to pass a rule that the cable cards and/or the set top boxes ought to be made universal and available for purchase from the third party. Cable set top box leasing is a major source of profit for the companies and are (in my opinion) clearly a rip off.
 
Back
Top