I ordered an AF100 in January, but held back the actual purchase until the dust settled. I've read all of the posts - Chevy vs Ford defensive, obstinately positive and nit-picky negative. I received my camera two weeks ago.
Here are my initial observations, for what they're worth.
First, to qualify my judgement, I primarily make documentaries, and have been doing that for a long time - long enough that I'm old, and inflexible and opinionated. And I'm not a technically-oriented person, I can't agree with or dispute the opinions of those who are. I base everything on how the camera feels organically, and how the picture looks on the screen. Pixels are for the leprechauns.
I prefer to handhold most of the time, so the first thing I bought, a month before the AF, was a Cineroid EVF so I could design and build a bracket for it.
The next consideration was a lens. Although I will use my Leica-R lenses as primes, I obviously needed a zoom. That horse has been beat to death, so I won't comment other than to say that I decided on the Zuiko 14-54 because it's the cheapest, is f2.8 wide, and I can toss it in the case as a backup when (oh, please) a functionally better, light-weight, T2.8, 5:1 parfocal zoom is available.
My first day I set up the camera (BTW, I prefer CINE-D, always have, always will) and took it while I walked my dog in the forest on a sunny day. I chose the forest because - lots of leaves - I wanted to torture the codec - and lots of exposure variation. I shot 60fps, 24fps, color and B&W. The images are excellent…
NO IMMEDIATE NEEED FOR AN EXTERNAL RECORDER - WHEW!
I say "whew" because if you're using an accessory EVF, you depend on the display - to confirm that you're recording, dial in WB, assure that your not VFR, and, with a varifocal lens, set focus…
BUT TO USE AN EXTERNAL RECORDER YOU WOULD NEED TO TURN ALL EXTERNAL OSD OFF.
Be nice if you could select to leave it on for HDMI only.
The 14-54 lens is attractively sharp, and with a big gear and FF you can stay in focus by dialing in the footage, but…
MANUALLY FOLLOWING F STOP IS OUT OF THE QUESTION WITH THESE ZOOMS.
That clunky 1/3 stop exposure change going from shade to full sun makes me want to throw the lens in the ocean.
And, I discovered one thing that I haven't seen mentioned, but maybe I've missed it…
IF YOU'RE SHOOTING VFR AND CHANGE SCENE FILES, THE FRAME RATE DOESN'T FOLLOW THE SCENE FILE CHANGE.
Then last weekend I shot a TV spot and, as I mentioned elsewhere, the Cineroid died and I had to finish with my HPX500. That gave me an unexpected (but not appreciated) opportunity to compare the two.
The P2 camera still wins in richness of color, but the AF is the undeniable winner overall. I can dial in the AF to come close and, for a TV spot at least, they can match pretty well. There's still something very super16-like about the pictures from that 500 though…
As for post, I use FCP, and have had no problems at all. I've read complaints about the time it takes transcoding to ProRes, but I didn't think it was any different than with P2, certainly not objectionable.
And, for what it's worth…
I'M NOT SEEING SERIOUS BANDING ISSUES AFTER GRADING, EVEN WITH CINE-D.
However - those SDHC cards? How do you keep track of them? After the comforting, solid, robust feel of P2 cards, those things are laughable.
Here are my initial observations, for what they're worth.
First, to qualify my judgement, I primarily make documentaries, and have been doing that for a long time - long enough that I'm old, and inflexible and opinionated. And I'm not a technically-oriented person, I can't agree with or dispute the opinions of those who are. I base everything on how the camera feels organically, and how the picture looks on the screen. Pixels are for the leprechauns.
I prefer to handhold most of the time, so the first thing I bought, a month before the AF, was a Cineroid EVF so I could design and build a bracket for it.
The next consideration was a lens. Although I will use my Leica-R lenses as primes, I obviously needed a zoom. That horse has been beat to death, so I won't comment other than to say that I decided on the Zuiko 14-54 because it's the cheapest, is f2.8 wide, and I can toss it in the case as a backup when (oh, please) a functionally better, light-weight, T2.8, 5:1 parfocal zoom is available.
My first day I set up the camera (BTW, I prefer CINE-D, always have, always will) and took it while I walked my dog in the forest on a sunny day. I chose the forest because - lots of leaves - I wanted to torture the codec - and lots of exposure variation. I shot 60fps, 24fps, color and B&W. The images are excellent…
NO IMMEDIATE NEEED FOR AN EXTERNAL RECORDER - WHEW!
I say "whew" because if you're using an accessory EVF, you depend on the display - to confirm that you're recording, dial in WB, assure that your not VFR, and, with a varifocal lens, set focus…
BUT TO USE AN EXTERNAL RECORDER YOU WOULD NEED TO TURN ALL EXTERNAL OSD OFF.
Be nice if you could select to leave it on for HDMI only.
The 14-54 lens is attractively sharp, and with a big gear and FF you can stay in focus by dialing in the footage, but…
MANUALLY FOLLOWING F STOP IS OUT OF THE QUESTION WITH THESE ZOOMS.
That clunky 1/3 stop exposure change going from shade to full sun makes me want to throw the lens in the ocean.
And, I discovered one thing that I haven't seen mentioned, but maybe I've missed it…
IF YOU'RE SHOOTING VFR AND CHANGE SCENE FILES, THE FRAME RATE DOESN'T FOLLOW THE SCENE FILE CHANGE.
Then last weekend I shot a TV spot and, as I mentioned elsewhere, the Cineroid died and I had to finish with my HPX500. That gave me an unexpected (but not appreciated) opportunity to compare the two.
The P2 camera still wins in richness of color, but the AF is the undeniable winner overall. I can dial in the AF to come close and, for a TV spot at least, they can match pretty well. There's still something very super16-like about the pictures from that 500 though…
As for post, I use FCP, and have had no problems at all. I've read complaints about the time it takes transcoding to ProRes, but I didn't think it was any different than with P2, certainly not objectionable.
And, for what it's worth…
I'M NOT SEEING SERIOUS BANDING ISSUES AFTER GRADING, EVEN WITH CINE-D.
However - those SDHC cards? How do you keep track of them? After the comforting, solid, robust feel of P2 cards, those things are laughable.
Last edited: