C300: Anectdotal C300 MKIII Gig Observations

puredrifting

Major Contributor
Hey all:

I haven't been around here much lately because I'm shooting a fun gig for a reality series this week on stage and we are using the C300 MKIII per request of the editorial department on the show. I havent shot reality in years so it is fun to jump back
into this pool because it's not insanity reality shooting, it's pretty easy and fun compared to a lot of 14 hours per day handheld reality I have shot in the past. This show is a contest show, similar to Shark Tank and Dragons Den.

Observations abut the C300 MKIII :

1. As a C200 and C300 MKII owner, if you are thinking about the C300 MKIII, I say go for it. It's so very familiar and easy/simple to use.

2. The images look wonderful. We are the B unit on a new reality show. A unit is the big stage, shooting on an amazing "Theater in the Round" set that is flanked by a HUGE 36' long 12' high video wall. A unit is shooting 8
Sony HDC-4300s on pedestals, fed into a Mobile Truck. Of course, they look beautiful, they are great cameras. It's a 4K show, everyone is shooting UHD, 29.97 https://pro.sony/en_FI/products/4k-and-hd-camera-systems/hdc-4300

3. We received a request from editorial, interestingly, to NOT shoot Sony (was thinking FX9) and to shoot C300 MKIII. Interesting, huh? Unlike A unit, our B unit is shooting all green screen. We're where the celebs and stars come
to shoot their after the big event to shoot their debriefs, confessionals, hero shots. We also have to periodically grab the camera and run outdoors to shoot quick b-roll of the contestants doing "b-roll and office"
kinds of things, so go from a big, comfortable studio to running around the studio lot with just the camera and sticks. I am grabbing a spare light and softbox for the occasional interiors in an ugly office. The C300 MKIII is very easy
to make the camera look good. We are shooting XF-AVC UHD 29.97 DF using CLog 3. I'm not a big fan of slow motion but on a whim, we shot one of the contestants, who is known for being on all of those Poker shows, shuffling and dealing cards,
and even had them throw cards at the lens and we shot it all at 120fps UHD and it looked really good. I'm impressed with the DGO sensor, it is better than my cameras, noticeably.

4. I'm using my CN E 18-80mm t/4.4 and man does it look good and work well in a reality TV situation. Producers on this show are constantly asking for both servo and crash zooms and we can deliver.
Lest you get all snobby and think, "Who the hell is shooting on camera zooms in 2021, I only use cine primes", yes, I still get asked a lot for servo zoom moves. Interesting, huh? The C300 MKIII and the CN E 18-80 are a match made in heaven.

5. I'm keying with a Matthews 8x8 Full Grid with two Aputure 300D MKIIs and opposite, fill is a 6x6 Scrim Jim with a full stop with just a tickle of output from another 300D MKII for fill. Using the new Aputure 60D up on a boompole with my 27" Nice Foto Parabolic
and an egg crate and man, even with out bald talent, it is really nice as a hair rim for the green screen to keep the compositors happy. As you know, using a "hair light" on bald is usually a no go because of the specular reflections but by making my hair light a
larger source and moving it closer, I am mitigating all of the bald issues pretty well. It is so refreshing to be on a stage with big instruments and lots of room. 12x12 green screen so we can shoot full body hero shots, 8x8 key and 6x6 fill is a nice luxury I rarely get these
days because of lack of room on real locations. But on this nice littel insert stage, I have the room and it's glorious. That new little Aputure 60D is a great little light, the whatever to Bowens adapter works a treat. You just can't beat big sources for making talent look good. 12x12 green screen lit up with two Kino Four Banks. Kinos still rule for lighting green screens and hey are still
really cheap to pickup now since the world has gone LED. You can get Four Banks and Divas for a song right now.

5. I wish I could post some screen caps but of course, under NDA, and I can't really release anything but a few gear shots. It's interesting, we were told this show is aimed at an "International Audience", I don't even know if it will ever air in the U.S.. We have a Russian Oligarch,
South American Businesswoman, and a diverse menu of American actors, musicians and other notable celebs from the world of computing too (you guys would dig who I am working with, he's an icon in computing and he has been on other reality shows, I can neeither deny or confirm who it is).

6. Shoutout to our sound mixer, great guy to work with, total pro. I hired him for a small project last year and he was good so now I have hired him for a week long reality show shoot at good (not great but good enough for 2021) rates when all of us are just happy to be shooting for a week.
Schoeps CMC641 into a SD 664. Yay, we have a Denecke Smart Slate too. COS-11s on talent, of course.

Anyway, enough of my rambling. In the real world, the C300 MKIII is a monster, I am VERY impressed with how far we can push and pull the XF-AVC with CLog 3, we just popped it into FCP X and applied the stock keyer and wow, is the C300 MKIII footage forgiving! Amazing.
While I fully appreciate all of the posted tests, shootouts and comparisons Chris and all of the usual suspects have posted, the more I shoot, the less I care about tests, I pretty much only care about what the camera can do for me on the job and the C300 MKIII delivers a
huge value, it is a great piece of gear. I would 100% buy it over the C500 MKII, not that the C500 MKII isn't also a great camera but I am just a S35 fan, I am not a FF fan.

If you're on the fence about is it worth spending double the money over a C70 for the same sensor, my vote is yes. The ergonomics on the C70 suck in comparison although the images are great, of course. But SDI, RAW, ergos, etc. are so worth it, at least on a reality TV gig.

IMG_0310.jpg
IMG_0306.jpg
IMG_0270.jpg
IMG_0309.jpg
IMG_0328.jpg
 
Great real-world report. Thanks Dan!

Also: I can tell you hired a solid soundie from the little Denecke JB-1 TC generator on the back of the camera. ;-)
 
Great real-world report. Thanks Dan!

Also: I can tell you hired a solid soundie from the little Denecke JB-1 TC generator on the back of the camera. ;-)

Good eye Jim! Yep, I love NOT doing sound myself as a DP or camera op. So much better to work with pro sound mixers.
 
The puredrifting stream of consciousness. Thanks for the write up Dan, sounds like an awesome project.

Nice to know the larger canon battery sticks out far enough for you to put your coffee on it.
 
While I fully appreciate all of the posted tests, shootouts and comparisons Chris and all of the usual suspects have posted, the more I shoot, the less I care about tests, I pretty much only care about what the camera can do for me on the job and the C300 MKIII delivers a
huge value, it is a great piece of gear. I would 100% buy it over the C500 MKII, not that the C500 MKII isn't also a great camera but I am just a S35 fan, I am not a FF fan.

Cool to hear some real world feedback. I agree with what you're saying about the C70 vs the C300 Mkiii. It all depends what type of work you do, but the C70 is almost impossible to use handheld because it's so light. Great for gimbals and on a tripod, but would be awful paired with something like that 18-80. By the time you spend the money on monitors and rigs, it might make sense just to buy the C300.

I gotta say I do think the tests are important. It is important to stress test the gear. From what I see side by side, the C70 with the "DGO Sensor," looks really similar to the C300 Mkii. I see improvement in the skin tone detail in lower luminance areas but it's also pretty minor. Obviously if you need RAW or 4K/60/120, it is a no brainier, but from my tests I am failing to see some giant leap in quality over the older sensor used on the C300 Mkii. Canon even left out things like the 2k/12bit and a bunch of color profiles.
 
Cool write-up Dan, looks like fun. FWIW I think there are a lot of nice backlit shots of bald guys

Screenshot 2021-03-25 1.52.03 AM.jpg
 
Great report and interesting observations for us non-Canon shooters. And thanks for the comment below. Many younger shooters look at me like I'm crazy when I say I often need a zoom while filming on certain jobs.

Cheis Young

4. I'm using my CN E 18-80mm t/4.4 and man does it look good and work well in a reality TV situation. Producers on this show are constantly asking for both servo and crash zooms and we can deliver.
Lest you get all snobby and think, "Who the hell is shooting on camera zooms in 2021, I only use cine primes", yes, I still get asked a lot for servo zoom moves. Interesting, huh? The C300 MKIII and the CN E 18-80 are a match made in heaven.
 
great write up Dan.


i was recently going through a few different camera setups, and The C300mk3 was one of the most compelling. price, features, and image quality are at the top of the list. in the end, i was sad my choices led me to another setup, because the C300mk3 would have been so much nicer to work with! but hey, right tool for the job, is how it always goes. But yeah, couldn’t agree more.
 
4. I'm using my CN E 18-80mm t/4.4 and man does it look good and work well in a reality TV situation. Producers on this show are constantly asking for both servo and crash zooms and we can deliver.
Lest you get all snobby and think, "Who the hell is shooting on camera zooms in 2021, I only use cine primes", yes, I still get asked a lot for servo zoom moves. Interesting, huh? The C300 MKIII and the CN E 18-80 are a match made in heaven.

And these are usually the same people who ask what $200 tripod to buy, what $100 wireless to get and what $21 microphone to order off of Amazon, because they spent all of their money on a camera and primes.

And on a side note of ridiculousness... I operated 3rd cam on a shoot yesterday on a Panasonic DSLR/Mirrorless(don't know the model, nor did I give a rats @ss) with a Cooke S4i prime(the A cam was an un-manned a lock-off, besides the 1st AC pulling remote focus). With two wooden wedges that you would normally shim dolly track with, under the lens to support it. I should have taken a pic.
 
Having had a C300 Mark III for a number of months and being most of the way through shooting an hour-long doc with it... I have to concur with Dan. I moved to it from the C200 for a number of reasons... and I really love it. It's also a killer pairing with the R5 for when you need that "full frame" look or as a b-cam.

Canon also really nailed the ergos on the C300-3/C500-2.
 
Last edited:
Nice to know the larger canon battery sticks out far enough for you to put your coffee on it.

In use, so NOT a problem or issue. Maybe it offends people aesthetically but we shot in cars, handheld as well as on this little insert stage all week
and not once did the battery sticking out, just like it does on our C200, present any issue.
 
Last edited:
Cool to hear some real world feedback. I agree with what you're saying about the C70 vs the C300 Mkiii. It all depends what type of work you do, but the C70 is almost impossible to use handheld because it's so light. Great for gimbals and on a tripod, but would be awful paired with something like that 18-80. By the time you spend the money on monitors and rigs, it might make sense just to buy the C300.

I gotta say I do think the tests are important. It is important to stress test the gear. From what I see side by side, the C70 with the "DGO Sensor," looks really similar to the C300 Mkii. I see improvement in the skin tone detail in lower luminance areas but it's also pretty minor. Obviously if you need RAW or 4K/60/120, it is a no brainier, but from my tests I am failing to see some giant leap in quality over the older sensor used on the C300 Mkii. Canon even left out things like the 2k/12bit and a bunch of color profiles.

Where I saw the huge improvements in the DGO sensor was in pulling test keys before we gave the footage to editorial. I own the C200 and the C300 MKII and the green footage shooting XF-AVC with the C300 MKIII keyed as well if not better than the CRL I usually
shoot with the C200. The C300 MKIII sensor is so clean, but not in a Sony, sterile, video looking way, more like in an Arri, smooth filmic way is the only way I can describe it anectdotally. We had a fairly low director chair for the sitting interviews
amd we discovered that we were actually seeing the grommets and ties at the bottom of the screen on a few shots with shorter stature talent. I simply slapped some old green tape I had on my tape roll, completely different than the digital green of the
green screen and the stock keyer in FCP X effortlessly keyed out those grommets and ties. With ZERO green screen tweaking, no spill suppression, edge cleanup, just keyer and click and it looked perfect. Impressive.

We were also forced to shoot a few b-roll lifestyle shots with the contestants in the world's ugliest conference room, it had holes punched in the wall and the texture and color of the stucco was hideous. I lit it with one Aputure 300D MKII and a 47" softbox, that was IT as I had all of
about 5 minutes to light it (you know how TV reality show schedules with talent are!) and that footage ended up looking surprisingly tolerable, if you had seen the actual room and how utterly disgusting it looked in real life. This is completely unscientific and not tested but the C300 MKIII
shares something with the Arri cameras and that is, it MAKES the images look better than the actual scene you are shooting in. It just had the right amount of dynamic range, smoothness, yet sharpness to give it "that look". Previously the only camera I have ever experienced this
phenomena with is the Arri Amira and Alexa Mini. Those cameras literally make everything look better than it does to your eye. The Venice doesn't. The FX9 doesn't. REDs definitely don't, you have to really light and light well to make REDs look good. This camera does it, more so than
my C200 or C300 MKII.

I'm sure one of you more video engineer savvy people could better describe what I am trying to describe here but based upon what I saw and what I shot, viewing it just in a tiny window on a 13" MBP, the C300 MKIII has that magical quality like the Arris and it costs a hell of lot less. It also really made me fall
more in love with my CN E 18-80mm t/4.4, it looks better on the C300 MKIII than either of my cameras.

Shoot wrapped last night, another one in the can. I'll post when the client puts out promos or the show, no idea of when that will be or how long it will take.
 
Last edited:
And these are usually the same people who ask what $200 tripod to buy, what $100 wireless to get and what $21 microphone to order off of Amazon, because they spent all of their money on a camera and primes.

And on a side note of ridiculousness... I operated 3rd cam on a shoot yesterday on a Panasonic DSLR/Mirrorless(don't know the model, nor did I give a rats @ss) with a Cooke S4i prime(the A cam was an un-manned a lock-off, besides the 1st AC pulling remote focus). With two wooden wedges that you would normally shim dolly track with, under the lens to support it. I should have taken a pic.

Yeah, someone in the producer or camera department doesn't quite get it there ;-) Yeesh. Supporting that work of art optics with dolly wedges. SMH.
 
Having had a C300 Mark III for a number of months and being most of the way through shooting an hour-long doc with it... I have to concur with Dan. I moved to it from the C200 for a number of reasons... and I really love it. It's also a killer pairing with the R5 for when you need that "full frame" look or as a b-cam.

Canon also really nailed the ergos on the C300-3/C500-2.

If I was buying a new camera today, after this shoot, it is undoubtedly the camera I would buy. It's a classic as far as I am concerned. It's like the C200 and 300 MKII went to Bora Bora to make a baby ;-), the best of both cameras and add a sprinkle of new DGO sensor and 4K 120p.
I'm still miffed at Canon that they wouldn't get me one to test but this was better than testing, it was making money and TV with it in the trenches.
 
Back
Top