David G. Smith
Steak Knife Member
David, the "expected gradual falloff at various distances" is not always a constant as a wide beam has a much steeper falloff than a barrow beam. It can be expected to follow the inverse square law of light falloff if the beam is 45 degrees as it is very predictable ( doubling the distance requires 4X the amount of light to be the same brightness, of every time the distance doubled there is 4X less lumens). For example, a very very narrow beam of 2 degrees will have almost the same bright spot ( brightness wise) at a huge distance varying perhaps only 5-10% up to 100ft. because it does not spread out it's lumens all over the place, it keeps them collimated within a narrow field. A wide reflector, on the other hand, will have a fast falloff after a distance doubling and the light level will be much less, perhaps 8X less than the medium ( 45 degree beam) reflector. It has to spread the lumens over a much wider area. The amount of lumens are the same wether a flood, medium or narrow beam. I can safely say that my AA powered led pocket flashlight is brighter than a 1K soft light because at 50 feet away my flashlight projects a small ultrabright spot, wheres the softlight spreads the light at a wider area but is much less bright at that same 50ft. distance. That is why when photometrics are done, the distance and beam angle must always be given in order to truly guage performance.
Absolutely. I do get the math of photometrics, for sure, and that is pretty much the starting point for me when it comes to my lighting design. The sticking point, I think, is that there are a lot of new lighting technology out there now that post specs that are inconclusive at best and deceptive at worst. Doing a lot of naughts gozinta naughts calculations based on manufacture specs is a nice exercise, but that won't beat setting the light up and taking your own light meter readings.




