GH5 How interested are you in a GH6 anymore?

Panasonic is proud to announce the development of the Lumix GH6 that combines the new Micro Four Thirds sensor and a new image processor. This flagship camera of the Lumix G Series will be commercialized for its release to world markets by the end of 2021.

As the next milestone in the evolution of the legacy of Lumix cameras, Panasonic is proud to announce that the development of the Lumix GH6 is underway. The flagship of the Lumix G Series and the latest model of the GH line, it is renowned for its stunning mobility and innovative video performance. Combining the high-speed sensor and Venus Engine image processor, the new GH6 realizes next-generation video expression. Providing 4:2:2 10-bit DCI 4K/60p recording capability, the Lumix GH6 achieves unlimited video recording when the camera is used under the certified operating temperature. It is reliable enough to record continuous footage for a desired duration. It also provides a 10-bit 4K 120p High Frame Rate (HFR) and Variable Frame Rate (VFR) for high resolution slow/quick motion video. Moreover, the GH6 records 10-bit 5.7K 60p video by taking full advantage of the newly developed Micro Four Thirds sensor. Accommodating a variety of recording modes and shooting assist functions, the GH6 enables photo/video hybrid-use for various purposes including films, music videos, documentaries and short clips for social media to meet the creators' needs.

Additional information regarding the release of this product will be announced at a later date

From B&H
  • New Micro Four Thirds Sensor
  • Updated Venus Engine Image Processor
  • 5.7K 60p Video, 10-Bit Sampling
  • DCI 4K 10-Bit 4:2:2, Unlimited Recording
  • UHD 4K 120p with 10-Bit HFR
  • Approximately $2500
 
Pretty much a MFT S1H.

10-bit 4K/120p is nice though for what it is.

But no AF mention likely = no improvement.

I never thought there would be, but just saying because you have to mention something like this to hold prospects over. Too many cameras running around.

I was hoping for 8K, even if it's mostly a gimmick for now. 8K/48fps would look really good on paper and certainly move units.
 
And it's advertised as a video camera. It should edge A7IV specs on 4K 120 FPS vs. 60. But the AF goes to Sony. And so does the stills performance.
 
We will not know about the autofocus until we hear more or when it comes out. I am sure there is more to follow other wise there would be more complete information.
 
Not happening, ha.

If Panasonic would like great AF, they need to give up IBIS, bit depth and/or HFRs, and it's too late because the feature cards were drawn and the ones who make their own sensors control their own sensors.

This is a weak development announcement. Company just doesn't know how to do anything exciting.

Canon's R5 teaser broke the internet in comparison.

a7SIII encored.

Even RED's new $25,000 swag - which most who are writing about it won't purchase - has 18 pages in 24 hours. They know how to create hype.
 
Trust I want it to happen. Truly so.

GH5 was a big deal, but most of the new kids on the block only use full-frame chips so the GH6 doesn't carry the same weight anymore.

I'm legacy these days, so I'll still buy a GH6. lol
 
If Panasonic could talk Sony into allowing it to have modern AF, it'd first introduce it in their higher end L-mount cameras. But it had not done so. In other words, chances of GH-6 having a super-duper auto focus. even if it has some phase detect points, are slim to none.

The same goes for Fuji, Nikon and Olympus/OMD. Sony made sensors have decent AF for stills and crap for video.
 
DLD said:
If Panasonic could talk Sony into allowing it to have modern AF, it'd first introduce it in their higher end L-mount cameras. But it had not done so.
Click to expand...

Is this based on actual information or speculation? Because from my point of view the statement is illogical. I imagine Sony wants to maintain it's full frame superiority whereas it has nothing to protect in the m43 area and therefore could be more open to allowing better AF.

Either way, I'm just speculating. We'll know sooner rather than later.
 
The whole market is mapped out and every camera is made to fit a niche. Oddly enough, the sensor size is among the least relevant variables. As mentioned in another thread, the new Fuji GFX50SII is a $4,000 medium format 51 MPX camera that only has 1080p video recording capability. In 2021! And that's because it has a Sony sensor and Sony doesn't want it to cannibalize its own $3,500 A7RIV that line-skips or crops 4K.

PS. Of course, I overslept those meetings at the Mitsubishi HQ. It could be entirely incidental. Wink-wink, nudge.
 
I don't think Sony is preventing Panasonic from developing a better AF system. More like Panasonic has conceded AF to Canon and Sony and will market their cameras for the things they are good at (lower price, unlimited record, no over heating). What would be the point spending the resources to develop a camera that would then need to compete directly with Sony and Canon? Even if they could attain the equivalent AF, Canon/Sony users wouldn't switch to a similar camera without the same robust family of lenses.
 
Last edited:
DLD said:
It's a Sony sensor with the phase detect auto focus points disabled.

You know what I mean, nudge-nudge?
Click to expand...
Do you have proof that Sony disabled PDAF?

I just read an article with a direct quote from Panasonic, saying they chose not to us PDAF because they believed it would hurt image quality:

"When we were developing the GH4, we were discussing whether to go with phase detection AF, or hybrid AF system of contrast AF with our own DFD (depth-from- defocus) technology. We thought that by having contrast AF with DFD, we could maximize picture quality. With phase detection AF, picture quality can be damaged. This is because with phase detection AF, picture quality can be damaged [by the phase detect pixels]. With contrast-detection AF and DFD technology, we don’t need any dedicated pixels [for autofocus] and we believe it is more precise."

https://thenewcamera.com/pdaf-may-damage-image-quality-panasonic/
This interview was from 2018. Three years ago! lol

This supports my opinion that when Sony sells its sensor it's up to the camera manufacture how to implement it. The above quote shows that Panasonic made a poor decision not use PDAF. This means Panasonic would have to do two things. First admit they made a mistake and then have the time and money to play catch up.
 
Last edited:
That's probably just a cover story

But yeah, tower jazz said the same thing about PDAF. (It causes PDAF striping I believe- like rows of dead pixels for the dedicated AF pixels). I dont think tower jazz is doing so hot these days

But the market has clearly spoken. Photographers like phase detect. Having things in focus is a far bigger contributor to image quality than the processing they have contrived to cover up the PDAF striping artifacts. (Anyway I dont notice image issues from pdaf...I think they have been cleverly concealed)
 
Peter C. said:
Do you have proof that Sony disabled PDAF? ...
Click to expand...

I didn't say Sony disabled Panasonic's PDAF. I said the cartel members agreed to product crippling in order to maintain a higher profit structure and greater overall control over the market. Which would have worked splendidly, had it not been for the smartphone manufacturers, which have destroyed a previously lucrative stand-alone camera business.

And what Panasonc said was pure bullcrap. Sony uses both PDAFand CDAF. Canon uses DP PDAF. Nikon dropped CD but kept PD. Panasonic dropped PD and kept CD. Fuji kept PD. Both Sony and Canon have the industry leading - it's close - AF for both stills and video. Nikon, Panasonic and Fujifilm have an OK AF for stills but not for video (all have various problems). Most importantly, in terms of the sales figures, Panasonic and Nikon are in dire straits and most executives in a familiar situation would have chosen an optimal business strategy, not a system with a minute decrease in a hypothetical performance at the expense of the convenience and market popularity. In other words, Panasonic is blowing smoke up people's behinds much like many manufacturers do.

Side note - Toyota and Subaru have insisted for years that their joint production sports car has so little power because there's "no room" for a turbocharger. The aftermarket tuners somehow didn't hear that claim and produced the turbo kits of their own. The real reason for the F86/BRZ lacking turbo was because neither manufacturer wanted to cannibalize sales of the adjacent models - Subaru WRX and Toyota Supra - which do have them. Likewise, Honda kept smaller engine with less power for Civic SI because it didn't want to interfere with the success of the Accord. Similar cars - Ford Focus ST, Hyundai Veloster N, Mazda 3, VW GTI/R, etc. - all have turbo charged 2L engine.
 
ahalpert said:
That's probably just a cover story

But yeah, tower jazz said the same thing about PDAF. (It causes PDAF striping I believe- like rows of dead pixels for the dedicated AF pixels). I dont think tower jazz is doing so hot these days

But the market has clearly spoken. Photographers like phase detect. Having things in focus is a far bigger contributor to image quality than the processing they have contrived to cover up the PDAF striping artifacts. (Anyway I dont notice image issues from pdaf...I think they have been cleverly concealed)
Click to expand...

I think it's reasonable to assume that dedicated pixels for PD could have had an impact but Panasonic was short sighted and took the easy way out by giving up on it and staying with the older established tech of contrast detect instead of trying over come PD issues. Could also be that they commonly concentrate on certain features while letting the competition develop others. Normally this strategy works. Our camera does 4k and your camera does slow motion, our camera has 10bit and your camera image stabilization. They just didn't foresee that AF feature being that important. I don't know if I could blame them because as recent as a year ago there was an intense debate here whether professionals would want to use AF. After all in cinema they still use manual focus.
 
I dont think its that difficult to add these features. Smartphones are adding them all. RED is adding PDAF and they're way more cinema-oriented than panasonic
 
One thing Panasonic did for stills was to eliminate the motion artifacts from the multi frame pixel shift sequence. Or, at least, managed to mitigate them. Sony's high end offers a 16-shot sequence (4x resolution) that can only be done on stationary subjects. And, as a sop to Panasonic, Sony agreed not to do a 4-shot sequence for double the res.

This is where (potentially), GH-6 can cover some ground in its relatively low resolution sensor. With a newer faster processor and sensor readout, having a 4-into-2 pixel shift mode would bring it into the $2,500 mainstream. And, if they can do a decent 16-into-4 job, then it'd take another step up..
 
ahalpert said:
I dont think its that difficult to add these features. Smartphones are adding them all. RED is adding PDAF and they're way more cinema-oriented than panasonic
Click to expand...

I can't claim to understand the inner workings of these systems but I'd imagine if it was that easy they would have switched. I think enabling phase detect is one thing but it's far more complex to program the camera to do face detection and tracking. This is where Sony and Canon put the time and money to develop an AF system that works well. We all can speculate the reasons why they didn't implement PD but at the end of the day it doesn't really matter because they didn't and it doesn't look like they will in the foreseeable future.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top