LaFinDuMonde
Active member
Re: XL2 first real life impression
There are some things that I like in teh XL2 over the DVX(which I own) (16:9 built-in, built in shoulder mount, etc.) and there are many things I like better in the DVX(focus NUMBERS, hard zoom, more film-like in my opinion, wide-angle built-in, etc.). However, it seems to me that most of the Xl2's advantages can be replicated in teh dvx with some $$$: ana adapter, shouldermount, and so on. However, i just watched the XL2 night video...
HOLY FOOKIN CRAP
Y is there no grain whatsoever??? Calm down... okay, would the dvx do similarly well in these night areas, or does the canon just shoot very clean in low-light? My upcoming film is mostly at night in NYC, so there is a lot of lights at night, but still its dark, like the XL2 night video. I would like to know if the video just happens to look good and a dvx would perform similarly, or does the canon have a big advantage here?
There are some things that I like in teh XL2 over the DVX(which I own) (16:9 built-in, built in shoulder mount, etc.) and there are many things I like better in the DVX(focus NUMBERS, hard zoom, more film-like in my opinion, wide-angle built-in, etc.). However, it seems to me that most of the Xl2's advantages can be replicated in teh dvx with some $$$: ana adapter, shouldermount, and so on. However, i just watched the XL2 night video...
HOLY FOOKIN CRAP
Y is there no grain whatsoever??? Calm down... okay, would the dvx do similarly well in these night areas, or does the canon just shoot very clean in low-light? My upcoming film is mostly at night in NYC, so there is a lot of lights at night, but still its dark, like the XL2 night video. I would like to know if the video just happens to look good and a dvx would perform similarly, or does the canon have a big advantage here?