GH5 Why no HEVC 10bit 4:2:2 mode?

roxics

Veteran
As the title asks, why does the GH5 not have a 10bit 4:2:2 H.265 HEVC mode?
I know H.265 is compressed more than H.264, but if both exist at a fixed bitrate of say 150Mbps, would the H.265 codec not create a better image?
 
H265/HEVC was considered a bit too demanding for the market at that time (January, 2017) and price point. Samsung NX-1 had it two years earlier but Samsung was not part of the cartel. On top of that, post/editing were a bit too demanding for H265 as well. And really, there wasn't much need for it, given the work the GH-5 owners were likely getting.
 
The GH5 does have HEVC 10 bit 4:2:0 4K30/4K24 72 Mbps, and also a 4992 x 3744 10 bit 30 fps mode, as well a 4K 400 Mbps 10bit 4:2:2 All-I in h.264 so codec-wise there is not much to complain about with a good assortment of quality choices and bit rates.

HEVC is not vastly different than h.264 in that both use DCT for spatial compression but HEVC has more temporal compression. It boils down to not so much better quality from HEVC than the same quality at lower bit rate.
 
Reading back the inquiry again, I now think the question was more about HEVC in general than about the exact specifications.

I don't remember what the NX1 had, but if it was 4:2:0 then I think the first camera that had HEVC 10-bit 4:2:2 was Canon's XF705 from 2018.

Based on forum discussions that popped up about it, the X-T3 seemed like it was the first cinema hybrid to really introduce the world to it, but that one was also 10-bit 4:2:0, internally.
 
HEVC H.265 will not be going very far in the future with the likes of major content suppliers like NETFLIX, FACEBOOK, YOUTUBE, BBC, AMAZON, and HULU as they will be providng content in AV1. Youtube already boycotts HEVC by providing 4K video only via its own VP9 codec. As a consequence, it currently does not play on Apple devices. AV1 is licence free and up to 30% more efficient than HEVC H.265. HEVC H.265 licencing has been a disaster. Although H.265 was released almost 5 years ago, adoption is slow. The primary reason for this is that unlike H.264 which has 1 patent pool, H.265 has 3 patent pools with different pricing structures and terms & conditions. The second patent pool (HEVC Advance) was introduced in 2015, 3 years after the launch. This unclarity about the royalties situation around H.265 was hindering the adoption and as a result, primary browsers have no support at all (e.g. Chrome, Firefox) or only partial support (Edge). Due to this, many content providers have stuck with H.264 because at least they know it will always play. H.265 IMHO may not amount to much once the following alliance members swing in behind AV1. For the above reasons I don't see many camera manufacturers going overboard on supporting H.265 in the future as in contrast to HEVC, AV1 will also show major improvements at low bitrates in cameras. AV1 is also backed by major chip vendors like INTEL, AMD, BROADCOM and ARM. To top it off in addition, the codec will be open source with the very permissive BSD licensing speeding up adoption. All in total contrast to what is happening with HEVC H.265. H.265 is a great codec but organizationally it has been and still is a disaster in implementation across the media and production industry.

Chris Young

http://aomedia.org/membership/members/
 
^Good stuff.

I wonder if it's easier to offer higher framerates with it as many consumer/prosumer cameras use it for 60+.
 
GH-5 had (has?) H265 only in the 6K "photo" mode.

NX-1 was 4:2:0.

6K "photo" mode is HEVC yes, but HEVC 10b 4:2:0 72 Mbps also available for 4K30/4K24. Can't say if it came in an update or was always there, but it's there now.
 
HEVC H.265 will not be going very far in the future with the likes of major content suppliers like NETFLIX, FACEBOOK, YOUTUBE, BBC, AMAZON, and HULU as they will be providng content in AV1. Youtube already boycotts HEVC by providing 4K video only via its own VP9 codec. As a consequence, it currently does not play on Apple devices. AV1 is licence free and up to 30% more efficient than HEVC H.265. HEVC H.265 licencing has been a disaster. Although H.265 was released almost 5 years ago, adoption is slow. The primary reason for this is that unlike H.264 which has 1 patent pool, H.265 has 3 patent pools with different pricing structures and terms & conditions. The second patent pool (HEVC Advance) was introduced in 2015, 3 years after the launch. This unclarity about the royalties situation around H.265 was hindering the adoption and as a result, primary browsers have no support at all (e.g. Chrome, Firefox) or only partial support (Edge). Due to this, many content providers have stuck with H.264 because at least they know it will always play. H.265 IMHO may not amount to much once the following alliance members swing in behind AV1. For the above reasons I don't see many camera manufacturers going overboard on supporting H.265 in the future as in contrast to HEVC, AV1 will also show major improvements at low bitrates in cameras. AV1 is also backed by major chip vendors like INTEL, AMD, BROADCOM and ARM. To top it off in addition, the codec will be open source with the very permissive BSD licensing speeding up adoption. All in total contrast to what is happening with HEVC H.265. H.265 is a great codec but organizationally it has been and still is a disaster in implementation across the media and production industry.

Chris Young

http://aomedia.org/membership/members/

YouTube used to not even accept my HEVC upload attempts but now it does, which is very convenient for me. Also, if you want to see 8k in HDR on YouTube, your HTPC, browser, player or smart TV app needs to have an AV1 decoder. My 8K Samsung QLED is a 2020 model and does not have the AV1 decoder. It will play back 8K 60/FPS HDR10 HEVC 10bit 420 from a USB flash drive or NAS, but streaming from YouTube 8K VP9 is only SDR, or 4K HDR10+. Such is life on the bleeding edge of tech.
 
YouTube used to not even accept my HEVC upload attempts but now it does, which is very convenient for me. Also, if you want to see 8k in HDR on YouTube, your HTPC, browser, player or smart TV app needs to have an AV1 decoder. My 8K Samsung QLED is a 2020 model and does not have the AV1 decoder. It will play back 8K 60/FPS HDR10 HEVC 10bit 420 from a USB flash drive or NAS, but streaming from YouTube 8K VP9 is only SDR, or 4K HDR10+. Such is life on the bleeding edge of tech.

Yes, it's all a bit of a mess. I think it's called advancement. Having to multi-purpose delivery requirements, broadcast, web, optical media [yes still get demand for that] etc is all a bit of a drag. VHS was so simple, wasn't it? :)

Chris Young
 
Back
Top