eddavid
Carbonite Member
thanks to everyone's advice - I have regraded - https://vimeo.com/112062119
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well 180 FPS is helpful - I didn't really do side by side comparisons or test charts or anything actually quantifiable or useful but the fs7 weighs 3 lbs and the f35 with batteries and monitor is like 15 lbs.
in terms of image - 444 12 bit out of the f35 can look wonderful and its dynamic range handling can be beautiful and its skin tones out of the box are natural and lovely in s gamut in most situations - but really I need to do a test - a real test.
I sent the fs7 back and I'm on a doc right now and then a bunch of commercial jobs but I really should do a test. but it's going to be pretty much f55 and f5 vs f35 look - but of course having a nice slo mo option is very useful and I think I'd wait till the raw recorder comes out then really see what's up with the images out of both.
Also Film Convert was less noisy in my quick work.
My videos were completely unscientific and just are for artistic purposes - i.e. I was lazy and just wanted to have an excuse to make a visual narrative idea I had and having the fs7 and knowing I had to return it quickly lit the fire under my butt. But I wish I did some test charts. but anyway - I would probably do f55 vs f35 in a test - wouldn't really think to bother with fs7 - but hey why not, right?
thanks - yes next time I get the camera I am going to test against f5, f35, red one, and f3.
I blew it this round - I didn't have the f5 available and I wanted to make something fun instead. Also I was greedy for the chance to do my comedy.