Michael Anthony Horrigan
More Cowbell Pictures
Not to be picky... but does a film simply set in the future qualify? I would think it would need more.The film must be about "time" in some way, as a central theme.
Just curious...
Mike
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not to be picky... but does a film simply set in the future qualify? I would think it would need more.The film must be about "time" in some way, as a central theme.
Yes, I figured as much. Just wanted to be sure. :thumbup:Time must be the theme.
I think being set in the future or past is not inherently a theme of time; unless travelling there.
Time should be an integral theme that runs through each film, but filmmakers are allowed to choose their own genres. A few examples are-- films where the central character is racing against time to complete a vital task, films that explicitly manipulate time through editing and storyline such that time is a central theme, time travel, films that deal with the cause and effect of time's influence.
Anyone with any camera can enter.
You have to be a member to enter, but you could join the day you upload.
The THEME of the film is time. Just using a gimmick does not satisfy the theme.
Just as in LoveFest the driving theme behind the film was "love". You couldn't satisfy that requirement by just having somebody answer a phone call and end it with "love you, bye." That wouldn't fly. Nor can you satisfy the theme of time by just including a slow-mo shot.
The film must be about "time" in some way, as a central theme.
So what you are saying is, if I make a movie and throw in a phone call with a funny quip about how the main character is going to be late, UNLESS he can travel through time! Then continue making the film about a pre-school musical, that is basically what you are looking for right? Good to know, I was worried for a minute that I would have to rework my idea.
"You may enter up to two films as the primary filmmaker. There is no limitation to how many films you may work on."
This may seem like a dumb question, but what constitutes primary filmmaker? Director or Producer? I ask because we actually have 3 films we could make and as an example in the Oscars the Producer gets the award for Best Picture, not the Director. So if I co-write, direct, and produce 2 of them, and then write and direct a 3rd that someone else produces, or different people produce all 3, how does that place with this rule?