The Things I See

Enjoyed the script. I could really envision the characters and the action. I'm not qualified to comment any more than that...thanks for the escape from reality!

Oh... I wood bee gladd two profred ure schripts in thee futur if yous liike?
 
Enjoyed the script. I could really envision the characters and the action. I'm not qualified to comment any more than that...thanks for the escape from reality!

Oh... I wood bee gladd two profred ure schripts in thee futur if yous liike?


Thanks for reading and commenting, mate. I would love you to proofread Zaza, as you have a marvelous grasp of the English language :thumbup: :dankk2:
 
LMAO.

Seriously though....I've worked in the publishing industry for years. If I only had a dime for every page I've proofed...wait...I do!

Let me know, I'd be glad to help anytime. It's always better to have a different set of eyes on things.
 
Starting with the opening sequence I also would chime in that less is more.

I am not a big fan of a voiceover in which a person states their name and who they are.

I do like however how visually you are but the action paragraphs are too cluncky, I would break up the paragraphs so that my eyes don't strain to read every word.

You can take out the character Maxwell and you would still have the story. So while he is an observer I also feel that he is nonactive which is what a lot of short films do is to have a voiceover to help describe the story.

Where is the monster?

If this is a true monster story, where is the monster? You have the light and the darkness fighting, but where is the monster itself?
 
Starting with the opening sequence I also would chime in that less is more.

I am not a big fan of a voiceover in which a person states their name and who they are.

I do like however how visually you are but the action paragraphs are too cluncky, I would break up the paragraphs so that my eyes don't strain to read every word.

You can take out the character Maxwell and you would still have the story. So while he is an observer I also feel that he is nonactive which is what a lot of short films do is to have a voiceover to help describe the story.

Where is the monster?

If this is a true monster story, where is the monster? You have the light and the darkness fighting, but where is the monster itself?

In such a short story as this on a theme so big, it was easier to have Maxwell as an observer with VO, in a longer version he would be describing this to someone. Maxwell's purpose is to represent humanity. He is also a man with a gift, but is it a gift or a burden?

In these Fests I do tend to bunch my action. in a longer script where I'm not pushed for space, I would not.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/monster
Above is a dictionary description of a monster. The dark in my story fits in more than one of the Nouns described. This story fits into the monster catagory!
 
Technically, the even the Light humanoid could be a monster by the Fests' definition, never mind the Dark. So I certainly don't see a problem there.
 
I can't argue with that, and yet... Isaac Brody started this ScriptFest with this quote from Hellboy (and The Hobbit) director Guillermo del Toro:

Horror allows you to look at the nastiness of the world, and accept it.

I certainly think DarkElastic's script has done this.

Also, just to be completely technical about it, there was nothing said about a monster theme; there simply had to be a monster.

And how the hell have I gone from busting DarkElastic's chops to defending him like this? :D
 
Capt - lol, you're not defending him, you're (as Desi Arnez would say) "esplaining' to me what you've interpreted in this story. You saw monsters I saw 'end of world' so we each interpreted the story differently, is all.

Maybe Dark likes it when you hold up your mighty shield in his honor. I feel we're playing tennis on Wii.
 
Capt - lol, you're not defending him, you're (as Desi Arnez would say) "esplaining' to me what you've interpreted in this story. You saw monsters I saw 'end of world' so we each interpreted the story differently, is all.

Maybe Dark likes it when you hold up your mighty shield in his honor. I feel we're playing tennis on Wii.

To end your little argument on my thread, I didn't need Captain's rescue as I already supplied you with a dictionary meaning of the word monster, which my script easily fits and thus threw your statement out before it took any serious hold (thanks for the assist though Captain, much appreciated).
It is apocolyptic, but it also has monsters in it.
You can interpret as you like, but it follows the guidelines.
 
Dark - the 'monster' interpretation to this fest is 'something outside the ecosystem, against the norm' - (by the way, I'm not into arguments but only showing my point of view and listening to yours and others).

You dark forces/light forces were neither dynamic characters or the principle characters. It was like watching the movie 300 and the battle going on was over there.

Maxwell was the central character without any physical action or interaction other than observation (called the "watchers in the bible").

Keaton's story had interaction with a monster so the monster became the dynamic character.

Your fight of monsters is so third person it wasn't the central focus of the story, Maxwell's V.O. was. Get rid of Maxwell and put me IN the story and would feel the monsters more because it's not third person view.

That's really all I am saying that I was too disassociated with your monster.
 
That's really all I am saying that I was too disassociated with your monster.

I can understand that and I totally agree. If I write a feature or extended script for this I would bring these characters together, thus removing that problem. But, as described, they are watchers who have no impact on the proceedings, as what is happening is far bigger than humanity.

It will do for a 6 page script though.
 
Okay, perhaps I was overcompensating for giving DarkElastic a hard time earlier when I "raised my mighty shield in his honor," and since I've clearly offended you greatly by doing so, to the point where you had to take a shot at me in another thread, I guess I should apologize for it. And I'll go ahead and apologize to him for further hijacking his thread while I'm at it. :)
 
Capt - you've not offended me at all!!! Not taking any shots at you. Not one.
Not trying to derail this thread, but just trying to clarify.
 
Back
Top