paulcurtis
Veteran
Okay, so it turned up this morning. I've had some time with it but juggling other things too.
First impressions. It feels a bit more solid than the first. The LCD on the back is a bit bigger and has less border and the EVF image is bigger too. The dials have changed and generally it seems good. Odd place for the movie button as usual. Thanks Sony. The shutter sounds a bit more 'thunky' it nice.
What i've done so far is to mount the A7s and the A7sII on top of each other so i can look at rolling shutter. I'm preparing a stack of videos and also looking at steady shot with long lenses just doing real kinds of moves. So far in terms of straight full frame on both the rolling shutter is identical.
Steadyshot is working as advertised. But i need to look through the footage properly before drawing any real conclusions.
I left it recording with occasionally picking it up and moving around, it was 4K XAVC and steady shot on. I got 30 mins out of it and it was warm but not stupidly hot. The ambient temp here isn't very hot either. I'm not sure whether there is a record limit on this of 30 mins. I think there might be, but that looks positive (not that i've ever run a shot that long). Moving it around and a warmer environment may change things.
XAVC 4K is pretty blocky, even at 100mbps. Ideally it should be a higher bitrate but i will compare the two with external recording. However if your delivery is 1080p then UHD recording and downscale would yield excellent results.
I will be doing step wedge tests, noise comparison and all the various things i tend to do to understand it's limitations. These will happen over the next few days/week as i have to fit them in with real work. I can still see the purple blobby noise but it is lessened.
However the Slog3/Sgamut.cine image just looks better to my eye. I have to understand the exposure correctly, 1600 ISO f5.6 1/160th appeared to match 3200 f5.6 1/160th on the A7s but the A7sII clearly showed more highlight range.
If anyone has any specific questions i'll do my best to answer them.
cheers
Paul
First impressions. It feels a bit more solid than the first. The LCD on the back is a bit bigger and has less border and the EVF image is bigger too. The dials have changed and generally it seems good. Odd place for the movie button as usual. Thanks Sony. The shutter sounds a bit more 'thunky' it nice.
What i've done so far is to mount the A7s and the A7sII on top of each other so i can look at rolling shutter. I'm preparing a stack of videos and also looking at steady shot with long lenses just doing real kinds of moves. So far in terms of straight full frame on both the rolling shutter is identical.
Steadyshot is working as advertised. But i need to look through the footage properly before drawing any real conclusions.
I left it recording with occasionally picking it up and moving around, it was 4K XAVC and steady shot on. I got 30 mins out of it and it was warm but not stupidly hot. The ambient temp here isn't very hot either. I'm not sure whether there is a record limit on this of 30 mins. I think there might be, but that looks positive (not that i've ever run a shot that long). Moving it around and a warmer environment may change things.
XAVC 4K is pretty blocky, even at 100mbps. Ideally it should be a higher bitrate but i will compare the two with external recording. However if your delivery is 1080p then UHD recording and downscale would yield excellent results.
I will be doing step wedge tests, noise comparison and all the various things i tend to do to understand it's limitations. These will happen over the next few days/week as i have to fit them in with real work. I can still see the purple blobby noise but it is lessened.
However the Slog3/Sgamut.cine image just looks better to my eye. I have to understand the exposure correctly, 1600 ISO f5.6 1/160th appeared to match 3200 f5.6 1/160th on the A7s but the A7sII clearly showed more highlight range.
If anyone has any specific questions i'll do my best to answer them.
cheers
Paul
