Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do not have as bad of a time shooting Super 8 with dialog as Barry and David suggest. I'm not saying they are wrong, just saying it was relatively pleasant. I did hurt myself by only shooting at 2.5:1 ratio which I almost pulled off but I had a bad cartridge which ruined a key scene. If I had only shot 5:1 I would have been totally covered. 10:1 is really not necessary if you plan your shots out right and don't expect an unreal amount of options at the editing table...also rehearse like crazy too!
If you're interested, this is a link to a short film of mine I did last year. It was shot on an Elmo 1012S-XL with no crystal sync, set at 24fps, and recorded using head and tail slates, a basic boom mic hooked up to my pc using Windows Sound Recorder. I did the whole short, camera included, on about $1,000. See what you think about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obSX_E51fUM
I would love to shoot a feature on Super 8. I realize 16mm would be good too but it would be very pricey.
I do not have as bad of a time shooting Super 8 with dialog as Barry and David suggest. I'm not saying they are wrong, just saying it was relatively pleasant. I did hurt myself by only shooting at 2.5:1 ratio which I almost pulled off but I had a bad cartridge which ruined a key scene. If I had only shot 5:1 I would have been totally covered. 10:1 is really not necessary if you plan your shots out right and don't expect an unreal amount of options at the editing table...also rehearse like crazy too!
If you're interested, this is a link to a short film of mine I did last year. It was shot on an Elmo 1012S-XL with no crystal sync, set at 24fps, and recorded using head and tail slates, a basic boom mic hooked up to my pc using Windows Sound Recorder. I did the whole short, camera included, on about $1,000. See what you think about it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obSX_E51fUM
I would love to shoot a feature on Super 8. I realize 16mm would be good too but it would be very pricey.
There is only one series of super8 cameras that have the requisite crystal-controlled motor that allows for accurate syncing of picture to dialogue: the Beaulieu 6008Pro/7008Pro/9008Pro. No other super8 camera will hold sync. Last time I bought one it cost $900; I have no idea what the market is like for them now.
The beaulieus are not silent, but they're reasonably quiet, with a bit of a homemade blimp you could probably do it. But should you?
I love super8, I think it's a fun format, but any DV camera will provide a crisper/sharper picture. This new hmc40 I'm playing with will blow any super8-shot picture into the weeds, as far as sharpness, clarity, dynamic range, everything. And yes, while Pro8mm does sell new Super8 stocks, so does Kodak. Unless Pro8mm has changed their service significantly in the last five years, I wouldn't go with 'em, I'd just buy the direct kodak stocks.
nouou, why would you want to shoot on Super8? Is it just to say that you shot on film? Because, yes, it's film, but it's also profoundly inconvenient -- you'll be shooting double-system sound, you're only getting two and a half minutes out of each roll of film, and each roll will cost you about $15, plus about $15.00 for processing, plus about $20 per roll for transfer to videotape, so that's $50 total per roll shot, or about $20 per minute of footage. Assuming that you're shooting a 90-minute feature film, at a 10:1 ratio, that's 900 minutes of source footage, at $20 per, is $18,000.00.
Are you sure you wouldn't rather just get an HMC40 or GH1 or 7D and use that instead? $2,000 total cost, and no actual cost per minute of footage.
Right, "pilotone" and sync pulses... if the external recorder knows how to "resolve" the tone, you can do frame-accurate audio sync with that system, certainly.
When I was shooting a lot of Super 8, I used a Canon 1014 XLS, with a TFG sync pulse generator. The sync pulse generator took the on-off signal from the PC flash contact of the camera and generated a sync tone that was recorded to one track on a stereo recorder. The production sound was recorded to the other track. We would then dub the production dialouge to Super 8 fullcoat mag track using a Super 8 Sound fullcoat recorder. The sync tone was resolved by the fullcoat recorder to maintain the speed of the audio based on the camera speed. We edited sound and picture on a four gang editing bench.
I wouldn't know how to resolve audio into a modern NLE or audio DAW/editor using a sync pulse or "Pilotone" signal now. You should be able to get sync with a digital audio recorder and a crystal sync camera. I think that Pro8mm does some camera modifications and might be able to hook up a high end camera with crystal control. Of course they sell crystal controlled cameras. None of that would be cheap though. You might be able to try syncing wild tracks using time manipulation in a NLE or audio DAW/editor.... but I personally think that life is way too short to try and to get into that.
Hi David,
I'm not looking to become active again in making films, but was commenting on the pilot tone system I used many years ago.
I have been sorting out my old equipment and having found that Super 8 is still going strong in certain areas, intended to offer the lot for sale including a Braun Nizo S800, the Farnell-Tandberg pilot tone system complete with the Tandberg 11-2 reel to reel portable/mains tape recorder and if wanted a Phillips N4422 reel to reel tape recorder with Sprocket Master attachement that syncs with pulses, film sprockets and other reel to reel recorders to maintain sync.
It would be nice to think that the sysyem that was top of the range 30 years ago could still help the new filmakers on the path to making good sound films and to me the price is not so important.
Good luck with your film making.
Malcolm
Ok Malcolm, I may not have read all of the posts as close as I should have, I apologize. The system you have is a very high end Super 8 production outfit.... for about 30 years ago. I began using Super 8 about that long ago and what you have would, back then, make the, how do we say, make the "Manly bits" gain attention!
Unfortunately, with the changes in technology, I don't really think that your gear (besides the camera) would be of interest to young, aspiring filmmakers. The digital video/HD revolution offers gear, with much more functionality, for them.
That being said, I think that your gear is very important to preserve, if not for the monetarily valuable on the used gear market. but for it's rarity and unique functionality. Now, I keep up, on eBay and elsewhere , with used Super 8 equipment and the Braun Nizo S800 is a very desirable camera. I have seen them go for close to $500.00 on eBay. You may want to post this on that site. For the audio gear, while yes, you might be able to find a buyer on an auction site, I, personally think that that may a sad way to dispose of that gear. Because of the quality of the gear, and the rarity, I think that it should be housed in a central archive house, that could maintain it and keep at the ready to preserve films that were shot using that type of sync sound system. I would advocate that you see who archives Super 8mm films, preferably a non-profit or government entity, and offer them the audio gear you have. Now, you may be able to get some cash out of it, I would make sure that the agreement to receive the gear included a clause that mandated restoration of the gear to near new condition and a clause that it would be maintained in that state. I would hate to think that a Tandberg 11-2 and a Phillips N4422 would be left to rot in a closet. I also hate to think that there might be some footage shot on Super 8mm, using a pilot tone system, that could not be preserved because there is no audio resolving gear available.
Good luck with that.
Dave.