I screwed up a bit. I bought the 18 to 135 instead of the 28-135 :crybaby: Oh well. It was late and I was tired. Still good enough for what I want.
I also screwed up on the remote. :crybaby: It's a 7D and doesn't fit the T2i.
After testing the lenses, I realize that the difference is much smaller than I thought.
For instance, 3.6 to 2.8 doesn't make much difference. It still gets a bit of motion blur on over cast days in amongst Forrest. I was thinking I could do Night shots with faint lighting. But what I'm visualizing is the 1.2 or better.
The reality is that the maximum extremes of the spectrum aren't even close to what I though.
I was thinking of seeing individual creators on the moon with a 270mm lens hand held with 2.8 aperture LOL. WAY OFF.
Now I'm hoping to get and 2X extender for my Macro 90mm 2.8 and my 18 - 135.
I think what I want is 11-55mm F1.2/1.4 IS USM. And then a 50-500mm F1.2/1.8 IS USM, and each of the 2 lens under $400. Obviously I'm dreaming LOL.
Still I'm happy and I know I'll do well with what I've got. Thanks guys.
I also screwed up on the remote. :crybaby: It's a 7D and doesn't fit the T2i.
After testing the lenses, I realize that the difference is much smaller than I thought.
For instance, 3.6 to 2.8 doesn't make much difference. It still gets a bit of motion blur on over cast days in amongst Forrest. I was thinking I could do Night shots with faint lighting. But what I'm visualizing is the 1.2 or better.
The reality is that the maximum extremes of the spectrum aren't even close to what I though.
I was thinking of seeing individual creators on the moon with a 270mm lens hand held with 2.8 aperture LOL. WAY OFF.
Now I'm hoping to get and 2X extender for my Macro 90mm 2.8 and my 18 - 135.
I think what I want is 11-55mm F1.2/1.4 IS USM. And then a 50-500mm F1.2/1.8 IS USM, and each of the 2 lens under $400. Obviously I'm dreaming LOL.
Still I'm happy and I know I'll do well with what I've got. Thanks guys.
