FWIW, any monitor benefits from a higher quality source. That was true with old B&W sets running off cable rather than off a rabbit ears and it's true of any monitor accepting 2560 vs. 1440 vs. 1080 vs. 720, etc. It's also true with regard to the dynamic range and the color palette.*Speaking of video tests, here's a tough test for any camera's AF. This was shot after the new firmware update was applied. Select 4K if you have a 4K capable monitor ...
OK, if you have a B&W monitor, the difference between F65 and NX1 will probably be marginal.
Hope you can post it soon, looking forward to it.
I can't imagine going back to shooting regularly with a DSLR though.
The C100 (without top handle) passes as a DSLR most of the time, so not much "stealth factor" to gain by using DSLR.
But there are other aspects to using a DSLR for filming and considering the price of the NX1 the C100 (and many others) stink
I admire the NX1 from a technological point of view and hope to see more videos, where it has been put to work by pros like you.
The question really ought to be whether NX1fills two requrements -
1) the minimum image quality/work flow required for the job;
2) the bang-for-the-buck visavis the competing products.
It seems that the second criterion is quantifiable while the first is fairly subjective.
Last edited: