Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The only conclusion that can be drawn from this post is that Red cameras are not for you but Arri is.
So what? That stuff is ancient.
Roger likes to operate the camera as well and so he prefers a system as close to operating the film cameras he knows like the back of his hand and like many he loves the 'Vision 3' nature of the Alexa capture.
Shooting on a Red can be a lot closer to using a computer with a lens mount and so far less intuitive to a lot of people but that doesn't mean there is something about it that makes it intrinsically hard to get amazing results from it.
Fincher, Scott, Soderbergh as directors - Cronenweth, Wolski,Trent Opaloch as DPs... I mean there's a fair few people who like that more post-involved tech savvy workflow that get decent enough results out of them.
And as for that last sentence, I completely agree with it, but then at the same time he 's just been shooting on film again hasn't he?
I'm a bit partial to RED. I don't know what it is but I like the look, maybe that they try and emulate film stock more than Sony, but one thing I don't understand is how RED's pricing got so nastily high over time. The RED One was $17.5k and their mantra was rendering obsolescence obsolete but who are they kidding? The camera's now are going for over $36k (EPIC DRAGON) and at one time RED even slashed their RED EPIC prices by almost half when Sony announced the new F series cameras (2012).
They slash and they slash and they slash, but they come out with newer models that go up and up and up.
The RED pricing is high at the moment I feel. The strong dollar makes it even more painful. When we got our Epic-M we paid 5.40 for the dollar, now it's 8.63. That's over 50% increase!
We were lucky back then.
Even just last August when we got our Battle Tested Dragon it was 6.40. Still within reason, but now it's crazy expensive for us.
Good thing the Raven came out;-)
... Fincher, Scott, Soderbergh as directors - Cronenweth, Wolski,Trent Opaloch as DPs... I mean there's a fair few people who like that more post-involved tech savvy workflow that get decent enough results out of them.
The RED pricing is high at the moment I feel. The strong dollar makes it even more painful. When we got our Epic-M we paid 5.40 for the dollar, now it's 8.63. That's over 50% increase!
We were lucky back then.
Even just last August when we got our Battle Tested Dragon it was 6.40. Still within reason, but now it's crazy expensive for us.
Good thing the Raven came out;-)
There are quite a few clips from the various Deakins films on YouTube. One of his most famous cuts is the train robbery from the "Assassination of Jesse James", with the locomotive coming through the forest.... I'm not really familiar with Deakins but I'm going to look at his work more. I think the only films I have seen by him are Skyfall, Courage Under Fire and O Brother so all this is news to me. It's a shame he didn't do Spectre because Skyfall looked so much better. Perhaps Roger is right about 4-5K. I prefer to film in 4K but can I really see a difference unless I pixel peep? I'm undecided on this....
There are quite a few clips from the various Deakins films on YouTube. One of his most famous cuts is the train robbery from the "Assassination of Jesse James", with the locomotive coming through the forest.
But ... there's a laughable (for my taste) scene in "True Grit" where Jeff Bridges (Rooster Cogburn) is being tried in a local courthouse. His "sunlight in through the window" shot looks so fake, I just had to stop watching it right there (wasn't excited by the film anyway).
In any case, my take on Deakins is that he is horribly inconsistent from film to film and shot to shot compared to Storaro, Hall, Surtees, Cronenwerth, et al.
I just like the look of Skyfall. Have a look at some of that lighting in the Chinese skyscraper. The only reason I was researching Deakins was when I watched Spectre I thought it looked old and analogue in comparison. I think that has to do with much of Spectre being shot on film. I'm not a Cohen brothers fan at all so that's why I've not seen much of his work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUyrRn-9rEQ
If one would like to use a Red as a photo camera, is it doable? (Studio work) Or there are some crucial omissions?
There are a number of cameras better suited for shooting stills professionally. RED for stills is more gimmick then best practices.