starcentral
Veteran
I'd say a better comparison would be that to have similar capabilities, an EPIC-X would need at least a mount, side ssd, a control device, pro io module, and v-mount plate, which puts it about $26k minimum compared to F5 which may be ~$16k street and closer to a working Scarlet with the same features.
Then if you consider that RED's MX sensor is 2 years old and will cost $6k to upgrade, that puts epic around $32k for an equivalent which is more than the F55's likely street price (~$30k?). But at that price, the F55 has a global shutter and dual recording and proxy recording built in...
Yep. which is why some of my peers here might hate me for saying it but ANY reasonable price Sony might have come up with for these cameras I feel would have been fair.
People complaining on other posts and blogs really aren't looking at what these cameras pack, nor are they looking at it from a business case perspective. I suspect a lot of the noise comes from hobbyists. I'm just tired of hearing it, if you can't afford it don't buy it - its that simple.