filmmaker1977
Carbonite Member
cheaper.. $12,500zakaree said:
Price changing it's true?
- Thread starter samuel33
- Start date
- Status
filmmaker1977
Carbonite Member
are you sure?.. it seems.. some of you :engel017: seem like boys w/out any experience in business.. jim's smile:ChrisForbes said:
rogar-BigGrin(DBG)sorry me :crybaby: but i had to say this..
edit
and i'm not cinematography.com user..
Last edited:
ChrisForbes
Well-known member
filmmaker1977 said:
Hmm? Sarcasm is so hard to do on a forum.
filmmaker1977
Carbonite Member
your quote is wrong.. the first part ("are you sure?") it is.. the rest? NOt at all.
i'm being just sincere.. i don't want offend any one.. but some of this enthusiasm (and your quote) is harmful (and you could figure.. if not why that title above your post?) of my needs.. our needs.. i mean: the red customer needs.. i'd say all..
btw, have you a reservation?
read the thread's author and pay attention to the meaning of his words.. only as example.. but i can get for you a lot of them if you wish..
if you want i can pm or open a thread only to see who can agree w/ my point.. i don't want just because i want to be productive not the contrary.. though i know the people here don't want to talk.. respect to jim, jarred, etc.. i also respect them.. because of that, i'm posting here not at cinematography.com..
a forum is for people can say what they/we think.. not necessarily as a deepshit consensus.. as i could get for now, the red digital cinema camera is a private company.. not yet a stock market company (maybe never.. following what jim has been saying) where the DVXuser posters share a part of the revenues but as red one dreamers=buyers (and i'm part of it)
i'm being just sincere.. i don't want offend any one.. but some of this enthusiasm (and your quote) is harmful (and you could figure.. if not why that title above your post?) of my needs.. our needs.. i mean: the red customer needs.. i'd say all..
btw, have you a reservation?
read the thread's author and pay attention to the meaning of his words.. only as example.. but i can get for you a lot of them if you wish..
if you want i can pm or open a thread only to see who can agree w/ my point.. i don't want just because i want to be productive not the contrary.. though i know the people here don't want to talk.. respect to jim, jarred, etc.. i also respect them.. because of that, i'm posting here not at cinematography.com..
a forum is for people can say what they/we think.. not necessarily as a deepshit consensus.. as i could get for now, the red digital cinema camera is a private company.. not yet a stock market company (maybe never.. following what jim has been saying) where the DVXuser posters share a part of the revenues but as red one dreamers=buyers (and i'm part of it)
Last edited:
filmmaker1977
Carbonite Member
in his post (title), Chris asked:
please ignore the following.. and i couldn't ignore.. and it is not anything personal..
why would it be? :violent5: just kidding.. just kidding.. not sarcasm..
edit
it wasn't anything about jim, red, DVXuser, whatever.. again: why would it be? :bath: it's about business under the buyer viewpoint..
please ignore the following.. and i couldn't ignore.. and it is not anything personal..
why would it be? :violent5: just kidding.. just kidding.. not sarcasm..edit
it wasn't anything about jim, red, DVXuser, whatever.. again: why would it be? :bath: it's about business under the buyer viewpoint..
Last edited:
- Status