I think they need to admit *why* you required the use of a "loaner" (read: rental camera).
Once they admit that it was a direct result of failures on *their* part, I'd like to see how they argue that *you* are responsible for shouldering the cost...
Glad everything was settled !! Yes, Jan is very helpful and watching over us kids here in this forum. I always got very prompt and helpful answers from her EVERYTIME.
Well to be fair - I asked for a loaner from day one. I didn't ask for it because my camera took a long time to repair. In fact, When I got the loaner I thought I was only going to have it for a few days, it wound up that I had it for a little over a month.
But - my point is - I asked for a loaner camera because I could not afford to be without a camera at the end of July. I had too many shoots scheduled, and canceling them would have been disasterous.
So, personally, I don't have a big problem paying for a loaner camera.
I haven't read the fine print on the HVX warranty, but I doubt if it says anything about Panasonic furnishing you with a replacement while your camera is repaired.
So, while I understand where you're coming from Max, at the time you have to keep in mind that no one involved realized my camera was going to be gone for over a month.
In fact, thats why I overnighted the camera to them - the original ideal plan was that I was going to ship it to them on Monday and hopefully get it back by Friday of that week. But...you know what they say about the best laid plans....
:thumbsup: