New_Zealand
Veteran
I had someone telling me that they thought you could get 6k or 7k out of the Samsung NX1 camera vs the 4k it already has. Does anyone have any thoughts about this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I believe it's F/2.0-2.8 ... I know, quibbling.I bit the bullet today and order the NX1 with the 16-50mm f/2.0 S lens.
I also read a while back, they will no longer be making cameras...
I wouldn't want to invest in their glass unless I knew I would have the potential to use it on future bodies. We all know how short the life span of a camera is these day's, but if your not concerned, I would grab one if I were you.
Will do on the update.
Isn't CES this month?
Trying to figure out what is the best setting for film shooting.
ha, yeah that would be amazing, but this was done in the lab, and likely not even in the body of the camera. as samsung has no 'higher end' camera, if it were possible in body, they would certainly include it. however write speeds required for 6k@240fps would be insane, even with the amazing h265 codec.Samsung engineers in testing got 6.5K 240fps out of the sensor, yet funnily enough they didn't think anybody else might really want that...
http://www.eoshd.com/2016/01/nikon-d5-versus-canon-1d-c-cinematic-4k-video-wins/The Sony A7R II for instance over-samples Ultra HD from a 5K sensor readout. The Samsung NX1 over-samples 4K from an enormous 6.5K readout.
Also puzzling is that even technically the D5 compares so poorly to most of the competition for 4K video in the consumer market, let alone the pro market. Although Nikon have a decently performing ‘flat’ image profile onboard (like on the D750 and D810) the camera still lacks a true professional LOG setting like the one found on the Sony A7 series cameras and the Canon 1D C. Technically speaking the crop meanwhile is a further embarrassment as is the dated 8bit codec. Even Samsung can do a 6.5K full pixel readout on their $1500 consumer camera, the NX1, thus avoiding any reduction in field of view. For Nikon to do this at 20MP was arguably easier than Samsung doing it at 28MP, as the lower the resolution of the full sensor the less bandwidth is required for the readout.

