hasselblad
Well-known member
When do you think they will announce the new Canon 5D Mark 3? In which respect will it be regarding its video capabilities?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I've been wondering if canon will bring out a camcorder to compete with the af100 and fs100 ...
or beef up the video specs on 5d mark3 and 7d mark2.
For example ... if they just added two things, a decent OPLF and HD-SDI out, it would upset the market quite a bit.
OPLF? Then just how do you think people would be able to take high res photos? Ain't gonna happen.
A better OLPF won't help the 5D or 7D because the space between the sampling is too high. Somebody already tried replacing the OLPF and the results were not good. The amount you'd need to basically blur the image would make it WAY TOO soft. The only solution is sampling ALL the pixels.
Is it really that far fetched to think Canon might do something like an AF100, FS100 when they are pretty much their in sensor size and functions. Clearly the current body wouldn't work but something more along the new Red, Epic I believe is the model I'm think of, doesn't that camera have stills capabilities? Just asking, I don't know squat but it doesn't seem so unrealistic to me. They gotta be looking at something completely new and "out of the box" to gain back lost of the "HD video or indie film market", the stills guys are there still to my knowledge. Probably not gonna happen but it would definitely be nice, lol....
As a still and video content creator, I believe Canon is in a strange spot. The still photographer side of me does not need to upgrade from the 5DMKII. 22MP is plenty of resolution, the images are very detailed and the color after RAW processing in Lightroom is just spot on. So a MKIII version is a tough sell for me for still work unless they can really improve the noise performance - like ISO 800 looking like ISO 200 of old etc...
Now for video, I would like to see some advances, but I do not need it to be in the same camera body. They would have a better product if they took a lower MP count sensor and sampled every pixel to create a nice video image, but this would kill the still body. So I think it would be wise to separate the two products but I don't think that will fly with marketing. So we will probably wind up with a 32MP still camera with some sort of downsample voodoo to get a 1080p video signal. It will I'm sure be better than the MKII so I guess all will be well except pricing will probably be higher than the MKII, just a guess.
I doubt they will go to 32 MP though
Why the doubt? 32 not only sounds legit tech wise, but also more or less confirmed by now.
Actually, anything less than 30 would be a pretty big disappointment (and, very very odd).
We're at 5k video now. Keep up...![]()
+ 1*sigh*
Totally why I hate these damn pixel wars. You know what was great about 35mm? It was a standard and, with a few exceptions (65mm, ect.), it stuck. Companies just worked to improve 35mm and that was it. Wouldn't it be great if they could just release another 24mp camera with better noise performance, more lattitude, ect?
I don't think that pixel war will end any time soon though and one of the reasons being that something like 99% of people thinks that more pixels equals better camera.*sigh*
Totally why I hate these damn pixel wars. You know what was great about 35mm? It was a standard and, with a few exceptions (65mm, ect.), it stuck. Companies just worked to improve 35mm and that was it. Wouldn't it be great if they could just release another 24mp camera with better noise performance, more lattitude, ect?