No its not comparable,more data is not visible ,maybe if you check pixel by pixel.I mean data rates higher than regular one, cause in lower ones you can see decrese of quality.
The other day I hit 114 Mbits per for a sustained 11 second clip. That alone was worth the few seconds it took to load magic lantern. Graded like a dream too...
I think it would be of enormous benefit if we could have some charts or tests posted? Matthew if you dont mine me asking - on the t2i what qscale did you have it set at for that many mbits?
Sounds like great progress is getting made with ML!
I haven't tested mine for that aspect but I sincerely doubt there will be any significant difference. The compression may be crappy on the T2i, 7D, etc., but the line skipping or pixel binning that's producing the moire and aliasing is how the sensor is read, not how its compressed.
In other words you'll get a slight quality increase from the decrease in compression, but the biggest causes of resolution loss (line skipping or binning) will just be baked in at a higher bit rate.
The zebras, histogram, AGC off, audio bars, etc are great though.
yeah coming from the GH-1 hack, the difference in the T2i is so slight it's not worth the risks as others have said the other features are more than worth it though.