FrameFarmMedia
Veteran
Looks much improved over the GH2 at ISO 3200 from what I can tell on Youtube. Nice to know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That looks really good even compressed. Cleaner than 800 ISO on GH2
That looks like compression blocking.Pretty heavy noise on the left side of his head, but I agree it looks great for 3200. It's holding its dr pretty well for this iso too I think.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K3qQbdH8A9I
This is a GH2 ISO test posted in november 2010. Everybody went Oooooooooh and Aaaaaaaaaaaaaah including me and I didn't know how quick to pre-order the GH2.
Strange that apperantly the GH2 pre-production models performed better at higher ISO's than the actual production models. This video shows less noise at higher ISOs than my GH2s do. In fact the only thing I shot in ISO 1800 looks like crap and if it wasn't porn I wouldn't been able to sell it. (must admit I never tried neat video).
So much for making buying decisions based on pre-productions models samples, folks
I'll wait till March or so.
Great point, BUT the GH3 is a better camera over the GH2. Everyone who has used one says so....
Yes true, EOSHD and Bloom are more credible than some vague dude in Taiwan who only uploads a few test videos to Youtube from time to time. But still, all tests with the GH3 so far were with pre-production models and beta firmware, right?
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Panasonic-Lumix-GH3-Digital-Camera-Review.htm
another review (pre-production 0.5 firmware)
is this suggesting no ETC mode?didn't see them mention it anywhere else in there review.