Looking at this the same way as 4k rendered down to 1080 looks better because the original detail is all there instead of some loss from starting with a 1080 source camera....
Wouldn't starting at 4096, and rendering down to 3840 POTENTIALLY keep the maximum detail? Maybe a PINCH better than 3840?
In working at 2.40:1 aspect, 4096 give me a FEW more vertical pixels out of the base 2160 height. Those would be crunched down a bit for the aspect to fit in 3840, but it might be better detail than just sticking with 3840 to begin with?
Get what I mean?
It is zero hassle for me to shrink it when rendering.
Wouldn't starting at 4096, and rendering down to 3840 POTENTIALLY keep the maximum detail? Maybe a PINCH better than 3840?
In working at 2.40:1 aspect, 4096 give me a FEW more vertical pixels out of the base 2160 height. Those would be crunched down a bit for the aspect to fit in 3840, but it might be better detail than just sticking with 3840 to begin with?
Get what I mean?
It is zero hassle for me to shrink it when rendering.