Brandon Ruiz
Member
It would have gone for much more if it was an actual 'Iscorama'.
Still, an Isco 54 with 1.33x? That's kinda cool.
Still, an Isco 54 with 1.33x? That's kinda cool.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I got hold on a Isco Iscomorphot 8/1.5x and its very small and I assume that even if I find any step-up ring it will vignette alot. Or does anybody know anything about this lense adapter?
It has a focus ring which goes down to 0.5m.
my rear tread is something like 24 mm and my rear glass is about the same.. maybe 22mm. When I look at Iscorama 36 pics I can see that the rear glass diameter is much smaller than the rear thread while mine is about the same....
I can´t measure it exactly since I don´t have the right tools...
How big is the rear glass on a iscorama 36?
Should i try to find some stepup´s or something for this or is it a dead end is it to small?
Thanks for taking time to help!
One small thing . . . . .
Mounting the (fast becoming a standard of sorts) Iscorama+Nikon 50mm f/1.8 on a 5D give you a 50mm F.O.V. (of course) . . . . but on a 550D this gives you a 80mm F.O.V.
Thanks Squig.. I found some step up rings from 24-37 and from 37-52 so I can use my nikon ai primes...
I held it up and its very hard to hold the camera and lense at the same time but I did saw some nice flares and squeesed picture..
I´ll guess I have to try the step up rings and hope for the best. Its cool since this focus down to 0.5 M.
My front end thread is 40mm so its a very small lense adapter...
Have to find a Isco 36 so I can start a Anamorphic project...
you could always do a saving private ryan and ask panavision to strip your isco coatings,or cheaper still get some acid and sand paper : )
I want flares so bad, I'm actually considering that. Panavision sounds expensive though. Can you really do it yourself?
Would diopters make any difference?
you have the beast 54 lens,the problem is massive front element,now using crap single element close up filters are going to give you crummuntic abomination distortion : ) ca as they say in hollywood.
so what you really need is an uncoated 95mm acromatic doublet diopter @ +0.5 power.
schneider or zeiss will do one for you but probably cost more cash than the isco.
stripping coatings off lens is very expensive especially non standard products,i was joking about the acid
if lack of flare is a killer,sell and look out for one of the smaller iscos or get a cheaper kowa..
Yes and no. 80mm vertically but it becomes 50mm horizontally once you stretch it in post.
if lack of flare is a killer,sell and look out for one of the smaller iscos or get a cheaper kowa..
I haven't tried those gears but they are a similar design to the cinevate so I don't think they will be very good on the isco. The problem with the focus ring on the isco is that it has a cone shape so the focus gears tend to slide off. If you tighten the screw type gears to stop the sliding it makes the focus stiff. So I'm thinking gears with more surface contact area like the zacuto and redrock might work better.
The other problem with the screw type gears is that each screw pulls on the wall of the gear which affects the alignment and I've found it really hard to get a perfectly round smooth operating gear. The original cinevate design had a brass ring under the gear teeth so there was no flex problem but the new design is all plastic and flexes easily.