I was looking at old saved HTML web pages on my hard drive, regarding HD cameras, and found one for the Panasonic AJ-HDC20A - costing around $60,000 several years ago.
is the HVX200 similar, better, or no way near it's quality?
.. OK... OK ... don't laugh, I know a $60,000 camera is better than the $6,000 camera, but I can't help wonder, ... IS IT REALLY, ?
being this AJ-HDC20A was from around 8 or so years ago, maybe the HVX200 is just as good now.
I attached the archived HTML page (.mht) format, so just one click opens it with text and pix's, I tried to remove the activeX that trys to load, but don't worry it's not needed to see the info on the page, so you can ignore the popup from IE6 about it.
I also attached a JPG from the page, of the camera, if you don't want to get the .mht file (zipped) here.
I would attach the USER Manual, but it's near 3megs even Zipped, so, it's way more than this site allows for PDF attachments.
is the HVX200 similar, better, or no way near it's quality?
.. OK... OK ... don't laugh, I know a $60,000 camera is better than the $6,000 camera, but I can't help wonder, ... IS IT REALLY, ?
being this AJ-HDC20A was from around 8 or so years ago, maybe the HVX200 is just as good now.
I attached the archived HTML page (.mht) format, so just one click opens it with text and pix's, I tried to remove the activeX that trys to load, but don't worry it's not needed to see the info on the page, so you can ignore the popup from IE6 about it.
I also attached a JPG from the page, of the camera, if you don't want to get the .mht file (zipped) here.
I would attach the USER Manual, but it's near 3megs even Zipped, so, it's way more than this site allows for PDF attachments.
Attachments
Last edited: