A little unusual question I suppose 
How barebones C300 with only lens attached (no LCD unit mounted) is perceived by people not knowing what camera is that? Can this be mistaken for being a big photo camera? Or most of the people straight away recognises that this is video camera?
I am thinking documentary wise. Even after 5D2 revolution DSLR's/mirrorless are not perceived by passerby as a "film making" machine. You can get some shots that you would be able otherwise - they're less intimidating. I am wondering if it's still true with C300, or it's size and form factor goes beyond the point that make people notice it more.
What is your experience?
How barebones C300 with only lens attached (no LCD unit mounted) is perceived by people not knowing what camera is that? Can this be mistaken for being a big photo camera? Or most of the people straight away recognises that this is video camera?
I am thinking documentary wise. Even after 5D2 revolution DSLR's/mirrorless are not perceived by passerby as a "film making" machine. You can get some shots that you would be able otherwise - they're less intimidating. I am wondering if it's still true with C300, or it's size and form factor goes beyond the point that make people notice it more.
What is your experience?
