Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what's the best mode to get this ?
and more seriously - what's lens can get close to that? (i mean the look, not the anamorphic ratio)
Sergio Leone shot in what is called Techniscope, which did NOT use anamorphic lenses. It was 2-perf 35mm. So you'll be able to get the look without resorting to anamorphic lenses. He shot using deep DOF, so he used a LOT of light and stopped the aperture down to maybe f8 or more. Also, he used wide-angle lenses a lot, sometimes even for close-ups. Tonino Delli Colli's lighting style uses hard light, not a lot of bounce or diffusion. This is typical of 1960's lighting.
So my advice to get that look is to use old manual lenses like Nikon F or Canon FD lenses from the 70's and 80's that are lower contrast like old lenses. The tough thing with a GH2 is that the 2x crop makes it tough to find lenses that are wide-angle enough. I guess you could also use the kit lens and use an Ultra Con or some kind of Low Con filter in front of it to get that retro look. Normally I'd say the kit lens is too slow, but since you'll want deep DOF for that Leone look, a slow lens works to your advantage.
Then use lots of raw, hard light and stop down to get that Spaghetti Western deep focus. And use a lot of brown and beige in your costumes and sets.![]()

i need to try this ultra con filter on the lens i'm getting - Panny Leica 14-50 2.8mm.. (yea, with OIS !) but how to get out the over sharpness? -2 is not enough, and post work will look a bit "posted" won't it? ...
i shot some tests today and i think that smooth indeed uncovers more noise in the shadows..
it's a shame because smooth is more soft on the contrast and looks more filmic,
but i suppose you can tweak cinema afterwards and still have less noise.
From my experience, you have to expose "Smooth" about 1/3 stop darker than "Cinema" to get about the same midtones. That way "Smooth" gives you improved detail in highlights as well as in shadows.Yes, I'd say so. I did some tests using a DSC Labs chart, which I will edit and upload this weekend (after I recover from my New Years Eve hangover). But here's a little preview of what I discovered: "Cinema Mode" does indeed provide a little more headroom in the highlights before clipping than "Smooth". But it's only 1/3 of a stop more. And, like I thought, the trade-off for that extra headroom is that midtones and shadows are darker. After I post these charts, I'll do some real-world tests to see which Film Mode on the GH2 looks best for clipped highlights.
From my experience, you have to expose "Smooth" about 1/3 stop darker than "Cinema" to get about the same midtones. That way "Smooth" gives you improved detail in highlights as well as in shadows.
The flipside is a bit more noise, because shadows and midtones are being lifted.
So "Cinema" seems to be preferable as long as the dynamic range it provides is enough. If you need more dynamic range, "Smooth" seems the way to go, IMO.
I would rather accept 200 ISO noise using "Smooth" at 160 ISO than using some kind of quality reducing filter in front of my good lenses. But that's just me.so it's either decent dynamic range with noise - smooth
or limited dynamic range but cleaner footage - cinema
so maybe an ultra con filter on cinema can solve this?
I would rather accept 200 ISO noise using "Smooth" at 160 ISO than using some kind of quality reducing filter in front of my good lenses. But that's just me.
so it's either decent dynamic range with noise - smooth
or limited dynamic range but cleaner footage - cinema
so maybe an ultra con filter on cinema can solve this?