Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Got my Ninja yesterday. Tested it, and I have following issues:
1) Doing quick panning with my camera (JVC GY HM100), made the recording on the Ninja terrible. I´ve got a lot of tearing of the image (upper part). Any firmware update ??
2) Naming convension on the files needs to be changed. The current naming is not usable for me. Why not using seperate names on the files (YYYYMMDD_XXX) ?
Bjarne
What is the mount the Ninja is on in this video: http://vimeo.com/22343270
I've never seen one that you could move around like that which a.) wouldn't flop over as soon as you let it go and b.) the Ninja/monitor/whatever wouldn't quickly work its way loose.
And none fo these are really 1080p in resolution, at any time. Video resolution of the best of the above stated, in terms of actual resolved pixels, is more like somewhere between 480p and 720p, with lots of artifacts
Definitely. The VG10 uses a higher-resolution sensor (same as in the NEX5) with line-skipping and down-rezzing just like all DSLRs.
The 5D, for example, is a rough ~1400 in horizontal resolution.
This is measured resolution, not image dimensions (which are in fact 1920x1080), if that was unclear.
We have users with a JCV HM100. They seem pretty happy with their pictures. I've seen screenshots - but, no, I don't have any objective comparative information except that you would not expect to see any motion artifacts with the Ninja footage.How about the Cannon VC20 and JVC HM100 (both of which I have) - is their HDMI resolution any better?
Please can I implore Atomos to change that system for numbering takes?! Please take a look at how JVC HM100 uses the shot logging system. I really hate having each individual clip wrapped in a folder before i can get at it. If you must keep what you have in v 1.04 fine - just give me another option whereby each time i press the record button I get given a new number for each clip without it's individual enclosing file/folder. And keep them rolling on a single long list in a single file. I don't care if you call them shots or takes or whatever (I happen to call them clips). Wrap all my day of shooting into one file and let me import into FCP all my .mov clips together as a nice long list with numbers that continue from 001 to 999. In addition, and when I want to, let me change the scene numbers or the shot numbers as I wish and start afresh. But, for now, please don't make me go into FCP and extract each .mov clip one at a time before I can start editing. Thanks also for a great product that, hopefully, can only get better with updates!
Thanks Lee - so no point in using a NEX VG10 with Ninja really.
Really? Says who? Is there some documentation about how the sensor works that makes you say this?The AF100 sensor works the same way
You're pretty much right about those points: you can't trigger "record" through HDMI. We haven't publicly announced the full specification and functionality of the HD-SDI model, the Samurai, yet so I can't give you details I'm afraid (but will be able to soon). SDI will, of course, give you longer cable runs, and is a locking connector. The Ninja and Samurai are intrinsically touchscreen devices, so they're always going to have screens, but you don't have to use them as monitors. But I completely take your point about wanting to keep it in your pocket, and remote-record would solve that. Finally, of course there is no difference in quality between HD-HDMI: they are both uncompressed 4:2:2 formats and will handle 10 bit resolution where it is supplied by the source.
Dave
Ninja users - anyone know of some comparison footage for keying? Been doing a lot of greenscreen with the HMC150, and the artifacts in fine details are a killer. I'm curious if 422 would be a noticeable difference in that department?
Thanks for the info - yep, hundreds of posts here about combating noise with the HMC; I just did a lengthy post regarding keying 150 footage with screen grabs of the things I'm working around; motion artifacts and very obvious compression around hair and fine details are something a 422 workflow may help with.
I'd imagine that some downloadable footage - same scene from the SD card and from the Ninja, just a second of hair, transparency, and details - would be a great test piece to sell the Ninja as an affordable keying aid.
I'm seriously considering your product - how does it function with a passive HDMI splitter? I use one of the cheap male cable to dual female jacks in a plastic block when I use two monitors on set (works just fine) - I'd love to not add one more powered gizmo to my setup - and the HMC just demands a calibrated monitor for critical work.