J.R. Hudson
Spirit Animal
Ah yes, I get you, but it's never "fresh" either - with all those rotting bodies around ;-)
:cheesy: :cheesy: :cheesy:
Never took it personally, and veiled condescension is not a big deal either...I enjoy trading the occasional cheap shot, as long as the other person can handle taking as well as giving.
I know we disagree...and I'll let it go. No problem.
As for zombie stuff...just as someone had mentioned about 30 Days Of Night having too much posturing and not enough horror in another thread, you have to remeber that these genres run in cycles. I'm no fan of horror, but I do notice trends in the genre, or even the sub-genres.
The 60's and 70's had all kinds of Dracula films, and then that got old...fast. Every Dracula angle was done, so they cool off on that stuff, and then they revisit it years later, and try to give it a different angle.
Zombie films are no different. You have the core element that you need to satisfy the zombie fans, but then you need an angle to draw in more mainstream viewers. Some of the stuff works, until it gets too weird, so then they go back to more conventional fare.
Wasn't Fido supposed to be a really unconventional zombie film? Did it work more as a comedy or zombie flick?
I had never heard of FIDO until recently; looks okay, but I think Shaun may have stolen the comedy angle.
Did you see Shaun DeSica ? Loved it.
I'm pretty easy when it comes to horror; It's my guilty pleasure genre. I can recognice the masterpieces
EXCORCIST, HALLOWEEN, THE THING
The camp that is so bad it's good
RETURN OF THE LIVING DEAD, CEMETARY MAN
The simply fun ones
Scream, Evil Dead
And the bad ones
Any PG-13 one relased today