Judging on the same distribution story story happened to GH2's predecessor I can come to a conclusion that it's not about poor management, it's made intentionally. It's a part of their marketing strategy. IMO they just don't believe they need to sell more.
Yeah, well good luck with that strategy. That's why Canon will remain king of the hill. It's pure idiocy. Panasonic wants to sell more compact cameras? Seriously, big volume compacts are going to the Canon and Nikon and smaller companies are losing out and dropping out of that market, because the margins are narrow and you can only make decent profit on volume, which Panasonic won't get due to the brand recognition in this specific space... most people think Canon, Nikon, Sony for small compacts - it would be extremely hard to overcome that without massive marketing spend, which Pana is not doing, and it might fail anyway as Canon etc. won't sit by calmly. So if they are looking for the compact market, it's stupid. It's the exact opposite of what they should be doing - they should be cultivating the higher end more discerning customer, because those customers are the ones who are willing to step away from the usual suspects (Canon etc.), and look to more rare guys like Panasonic, if Panasonic is willing to deliver the high end. That's what they did - successfully with the LX series: LX1-LX5. They should put their effort there, at the prosumer segment where they have the technical advantage. Meanwhile, if they play games like that, they are going to alienate the very people whom they need to cultivate. I'm one example of that failed strategy - I'm simply not going to put up with BS like this, and if Nikon or Canon steps up to the plate with something close to the GH2, I'm gone, because at least I know I'll have product available to buy and the support, instead of juvenile games; I am planning on a project, but my rule is to always buy the gear at the last moment, because you never know how your plans may change or your budget - and if I'm looking at products from a company like Panasonic, then I simply cannot have confidence that the gear will be there when I'm ready to buy... an issue I won't have with a Canon. So what Panasonic is doing is alienating exactly the clients they should cater to, in a stupid and unrealistic quest for a mass market consumer they'll never get. But hey, what do I know, I don't sit in Panasonic management - however there are things I DO know, and that is MY reaction... and my reaction is extremely negative toward these tactics.
Yeah, well good luck with that strategy. That's why Canon will remain king of the hill. It's pure idiocy. Panasonic wants to sell more compact cameras? Seriously, big volume compacts are going to the Canon and Nikon and smaller companies are losing out and dropping out of that market, because the margins are narrow and you can only make decent profit on volume, which Panasonic won't get due to the brand recognition in this specific space... most people think Canon, Nikon, Sony for small compacts - it would be extremely hard to overcome that without massive marketing spend, which Pana is not doing, and it might fail anyway as Canon etc. won't sit by calmly. So if they are looking for the compact market, it's stupid. It's the exact opposite of what they should be doing - they should be cultivating the higher end more discerning customer, because those customers are the ones who are willing to step away from the usual suspects (Canon etc.), and look to more rare guys like Panasonic, if Panasonic is willing to deliver the high end. That's what they did - successfully with the LX series: LX1-LX5. They should put their effort there, at the prosumer segment where they have the technical advantage. Meanwhile, if they play games like that, they are going to alienate the very people whom they need to cultivate. I'm one example of that failed strategy - I'm simply not going to put up with BS like this, and if Nikon or Canon steps up to the plate with something close to the GH2, I'm gone, because at least I know I'll have product available to buy and the support, instead of juvenile games; I am planning on a project, but my rule is to always buy the gear at the last moment, because you never know how your plans may change or your budget - and if I'm looking at products from a company like Panasonic, then I simply cannot have confidence that the gear will be there when I'm ready to buy... an issue I won't have with a Canon. So what Panasonic is doing is alienating exactly the clients they should cater to, in a stupid and unrealistic quest for a mass market consumer they'll never get. But hey, what do I know, I don't sit in Panasonic management - however there are things I DO know, and that is MY reaction... and my reaction is extremely negative toward these tactics.