Johnny Cola just posted a link to this footage here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrHsNreo6HE&fmt=22
This shows the kit lens at f4.7 and iso 1600 compared to a sumilux at f1.4 and iso 200. Same scene in both shots.
Looking at this, on YouTube of course, I see no real noise in the 1600 iso footage. The main difference between the two is the shallower depth of field you'd get with the faster lens.
Going to full screen mode, I can see some noise in the patio door at 1600. But really, its the kind of noise level that people are only going to notice if the content of your footage is extremely boring, this half asleep dog is exciting enough to distract from it.
So, for web delivery, seems like you can shoot at 1600 with the kit lens and get a fine image.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrHsNreo6HE&fmt=22
This shows the kit lens at f4.7 and iso 1600 compared to a sumilux at f1.4 and iso 200. Same scene in both shots.
Looking at this, on YouTube of course, I see no real noise in the 1600 iso footage. The main difference between the two is the shallower depth of field you'd get with the faster lens.
Going to full screen mode, I can see some noise in the patio door at 1600. But really, its the kind of noise level that people are only going to notice if the content of your footage is extremely boring, this half asleep dog is exciting enough to distract from it.
So, for web delivery, seems like you can shoot at 1600 with the kit lens and get a fine image.
Last edited: