Barry_Green
Moderator
Can't answer for Mitch, just observing... If the second number was mistaken, and was meant to be 3260 instead, then it makes a lot more sense. 4520 x 3260 is close to 1.33:1, and the EVA's full sensor pixel height should be about 3260 (5720 x 3240 is about the full frame size for its 5.7k mode).
There's pretty much no way the sensor has anywhere near 4260 pixels vertically, so my bet is that it was a simple verbal mistake and they meant to say 3240 or 3260 or thereabouts.
There's pretty much no way the sensor has anywhere near 4260 pixels vertically, so my bet is that it was a simple verbal mistake and they meant to say 3240 or 3260 or thereabouts.